2003 · Week 16 · Division

Final

Cardinals

Arizona

QB Josh McCown

10·28

Seahawks

Seattle

QB Matt Hasselbeck

Seahawks Stadium · outdoors · fieldturf · 49°F · wind 3mph

Closing spread

SEA -15.5

Total

44.5

Model margin

+4.3est.

SEA perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Seahawks
  • Cardinals

How each play moved the game.

Seahawks winsCardinals wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Cardinalsedge mapSeahawks
  • -0.154EPA / play+0.070
  • 39.4%Success rate46.1%
  • -0.108EPA / dropback+0.148
  • -0.236EPA / rush-0.039
  • 7.0%Explosive rate10.5%
  • 37.2%Third-down rate46.8%
  • 46.3%Red-zone TD rate68.2%
  • 0.93Points / drive1.98
  • 3.4%Turnover rate2.4%
  • +0.075EPA / play allowed-0.012

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

SEA lead 30–17–1 since 1999

SEA have won 9 straight. Meetings average 43.5 points. SEA are 26-21-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W10ARI @ SEA2244SEA
2025 · W4SEA @ ARI2320SEA
2024 · W14SEA @ ARI3018SEA
2024 · W12ARI @ SEA616SEA
2023 · W18SEA @ ARI2120SEA
2023 · W7ARI @ SEA1020SEA
2022 · W9SEA @ ARI3121SEA
2022 · W6ARI @ SEA919SEA

Box score

Individual performances

Cardinals

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Josh McCown25/4027410

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Josh McCown8384.80
Marcel Shipp12322.70
Emmitt Smith492.30
Damien Anderson155.00
Anquan Boldin1-5-5.00

Seahawks

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Matt Hasselbeck17/2417911
Trent Dilfer2/31111

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Shaun Alexander211356.42
Maurice Morris11313.00
Trent Dilfer100.00
Matt Hasselbeck3-5-1.70

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +15.57.5%3.2%4.9%3.2%2.9%

Positive margins favour Seahawks; negative favour Cardinals.

Half-point at risk

1.46%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

60.6%

Expected total

46.0est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+4.44
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment-2.69
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+4.31