2005 · Week 10

Final

Cardinals

Arizona

QB Kurt Warner

21·29

Lions

Detroit

QB Joey Harrington

Ford Field · dome · fieldturf

Closing spread

DET -4

Total

40

Model margin

+0.8est.

DET perspective

Push chance

2.5%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Lions
  • Cardinals

How each play moved the game.

Lions winsCardinals wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Cardinalsedge mapLions
  • -0.074EPA / play-0.102
  • 40.7%Success rate38.8%
  • +0.031EPA / dropback-0.109
  • -0.308EPA / rush-0.090
  • 8.0%Explosive rate5.7%
  • 38.3%Third-down rate38.8%
  • 42.5%Red-zone TD rate54.3%
  • 1.36Points / drive1.20
  • 3.1%Turnover rate2.8%
  • -0.050EPA / play allowed-0.020

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

ARI lead 10–8–1 since 1999

DET have won 3 straight. Meetings average 46.6 points. DET are 9-10 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2024 · W3DET @ ARI2013DET
2021 · W15ARI @ DET1230DET
2020 · W3DET @ ARI2623DET
2019 · W1DET @ ARI2727Tie
2018 · W14DET @ ARI173DET
2017 · W1ARI @ DET2335DET
2015 · W5ARI @ DET4217ARI
2014 · W11DET @ ARI614ARI

Box score

Individual performances

Cardinals

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Kurt Warner29/4535910

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
J.J. Arrington8243.01
Obafemi Ayanbadejo3113.70
Marcel Shipp430.80
Kurt Warner100.00

Lions

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Joey Harrington22/3223130

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Kevin Jones14815.80
Shawn Bryson7446.30
Artose Pinner7192.70
Joey Harrington4133.30

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +44.3%2.9%7.3%7.4%3.0%4.5%2.8%

Positive margins favour Lions; negative favour Cardinals.

Half-point at risk

2.48%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

51.1%

Expected total

43.3est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-1.80
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+0.76