2017 · Week 1

Final

Cardinals

Arizona

QB Carson Palmer

23·35

Lions

Detroit

QB Matthew Stafford

Ford Field · dome · fieldturf

Closing spread

ARI -2.5

Total

48.5

Model margin

+1.9est.

DET perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Lions
  • Cardinals

How each play moved the game.

Lions winsCardinals wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Cardinalsedge mapLions
  • -0.129EPA / play-0.046
  • 38.8%Success rate40.8%
  • -0.086EPA / dropback+0.074
  • -0.207EPA / rush-0.278
  • 7.2%Explosive rate8.7%
  • -4.25CPOE+0.41
  • 35.7%Third-down rate38.4%
  • 52.2%Red-zone TD rate64.3%
  • 1.20Points / drive1.78
  • 2.3%Turnover rate2.1%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

ARI lead 10–8–1 since 1999

DET have won 3 straight. Meetings average 46.6 points. DET are 9-10 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2024 · W3DET @ ARI2013DET
2021 · W15ARI @ DET1230DET
2020 · W3DET @ ARI2623DET
2019 · W1DET @ ARI2727Tie
2018 · W14DET @ ARI173DET
2015 · W5ARI @ DET4217ARI
2014 · W11DET @ ARI614ARI
2013 · W2DET @ ARI2125ARI

Box score

Individual performances

Cardinals

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Carson Palmer27/4826813

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
David Johnson11232.10
Kerwynn Williams5102.01
John Brown11010.00
Carson Palmer122.00

Lions

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Matthew Stafford29/4129241

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Ameer Abdullah15302.00
Dwayne Washington6223.70
Matthew Stafford2147.00
Golden Tate273.50
Theo Riddick1-1-1.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Golden Tate10121070
Kenny Golladay47692
Marvin Jones22371
T.J. Jones24320
Theo Riddick67271
Ameer Abdullah34110
Eric Ebron2390

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line -2.54.1%2.7%7.1%7.5%3.1%4.7%2.9%

Positive margins favour Lions; negative favour Cardinals.

Half-point at risk

2.06%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

54.0%

Expected total

42.5est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+0.11
  • Home-field advantage+1.74
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+1.85