2005 · Week 13

Final

Commanders

Washington

QB Mark Brunell

24·9

Rams

St. Louis

QB Ryan Fitzpatrick

Edward Jones Dome · dome · fieldturf

Closing spread

WAS -3

Total

45

Model margin

+1.2est.

STL perspective

Push chance

7.2%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Rams
  • Commanders

How each play moved the game.

Rams winsCommanders wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

The rivalry

All square 7–7 since 1999

RAMS have won 2 straight. Meetings average 40.6 points. STL are 8-6 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2023 · W15WAS @ LA20–28RAMS
2020 · W5LA @ WAS30–10RAMS
2017 · W2WAS @ LA27–20WAS
2015 · W2STL @ WAS10–24WAS
2014 · W14STL @ WAS24–0RAMS
2012 · W2WAS @ STL28–31RAMS
2011 · W4WAS @ STL17–10WAS
2010 · W3WAS @ STL16–30RAMS

Possession by possession

How it unfolded

Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.

Drive-by-drive log
BallStartPlaysYardsResultWAS–STL
WASQ1 15:00520Punt0–0
LAQ1 12:453-19Punt0–0
WASQ1 11:15248Touchdown7–0
LAQ1 10:29614Punt7–0
WASQ1 7:1331Punt7–0
LAQ1 6:13616Punt7–0
WASQ1 4:06740Missed field goal7–0
LAQ2 14:5538Punt7–0
WASQ2 13:3535Punt7–0
LAQ2 12:051271Touchdown7–7
WASQ2 7:05878Field goal10–7
LAQ2 3:1147Punt10–7
WASQ2 1:33433End of half10–7
LAQ3 15:0039Punt10–7
WASQ3 12:481156Punt10–7
LAQ3 5:27723Punt10–7
WASQ3 2:03769Touchdown17–7
LAQ4 13:4636Punt17–9
WASQ4 11:591-6Safety17–9
LAQ4 11:5500Turnover17–9
LAQ4 11:4917Turnover17–9
LAQ4 11:1610Turnover17–9
WASQ4 11:10945Touchdown24–9
LAQ4 5:50949Turnover24–9
WASQ4 2:47419End of half24–9

Box score

Individual performances

Commanders

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Mark Brunell14/2115610
Clinton Portis0/1000

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Clinton Portis271365.02
Rock Cartwright911813.10
Nehemiah Broughton133.00
Mark Brunell300.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line -34.2%2.8%7.2%7.5%3.0%4.6%2.9%

Positive margins favour Rams; negative favour Commanders.

Half-point at risk

7.20%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

52.2%

Expected total

43.8est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-1.40
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+1.16

One or both ratings are carry-over priors — no games have been played this season yet, so treat this as a starting assumption rather than a read.