2005 · Week 14

Final

Commanders

Washington

QB Mark Brunell

17·13

Cardinals

Arizona

QB Kurt Warner

Sun Devil Stadium · outdoors · grass · 66°F · wind 0mph

Closing spread

WAS -3

Total

41.5

Model margin

+1.7est.

ARI perspective

Push chance

7.1%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Cardinals
  • Commanders

How each play moved the game.

Cardinals winsCommanders wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Commandersedge mapCardinals
  • +0.014EPA / play-0.074
  • 41.3%Success rate40.7%
  • +0.100EPA / dropback+0.031
  • -0.083EPA / rush-0.308
  • 8.5%Explosive rate8.0%
  • 43.1%Third-down rate38.3%
  • 58.5%Red-zone TD rate42.5%
  • 1.80Points / drive1.36
  • 2.3%Turnover rate3.1%
  • -0.058EPA / play allowed-0.050

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

WAS lead 14–4 since 1999

WAS have won 2 straight. Meetings average 38.9 points. ARI are 8-10 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2024 · W4WAS @ ARI4214WAS
2023 · W1ARI @ WAS1620WAS
2020 · W2WAS @ ARI1530ARI
2018 · W1WAS @ ARI246WAS
2017 · W15ARI @ WAS1520WAS
2016 · W13WAS @ ARI2331ARI
2014 · W6WAS @ ARI2030ARI
2011 · W2ARI @ WAS2122WAS

Box score

Individual performances

Commanders

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Mark Brunell18/2812203

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Clinton Portis261054.01
Ladell Betts561.20
Mark Brunell3-2-0.70

Cardinals

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Kurt Warner25/4125511

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Marcel Shipp7273.90
J.J. Arrington9262.90
Anquan Boldin166.00
Kurt Warner133.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line -34.1%2.8%7.1%7.5%3.1%4.6%2.9%

Positive margins favour Cardinals; negative favour Commanders.

Half-point at risk

7.12%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

53.7%

Expected total

43.3est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-0.84
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+1.72