2006 · Week 1 · Division

Final

49ers

San Francisco

QB Alex Smith

27·34

Cardinals

Arizona

QB Kurt Warner

University of Phoenix Stadium · closed · grass

Closing spread

ARI -9.5

Total

44

Model margin

+5.4est.

ARI perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Cardinals
  • 49ers

How each play moved the game.

Cardinals wins49ers wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

49ersedge mapCardinals
  • -0.091EPA / play-0.045
  • 39.6%Success rate42.0%
  • -0.094EPA / dropback+0.036
  • -0.088EPA / rush-0.164
  • 9.6%Explosive rate7.2%
  • -0.50CPOE-3.07
  • 33.3%Third-down rate39.4%
  • 46.1%Red-zone TD rate53.4%
  • 1.43Points / drive1.52
  • 3.1%Turnover rate2.7%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

SF lead 28–22 since 1999

SF have won 2 straight. Meetings average 44.8 points. ARI are 23-26-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W11SF @ ARI4122SF
2025 · W3ARI @ SF1516SF
2024 · W18SF @ ARI2447ARI
2024 · W5ARI @ SF2423ARI
2023 · W15SF @ ARI4529SF
2023 · W4ARI @ SF1635SF
2022 · W18ARI @ SF1338SF
2022 · W11SF @ ARI3810SF

Box score

Individual performances

49ers

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Alex Smith23/4028810

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Frank Gore16875.42
Bryan Gilmore12222.00

Cardinals

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Kurt Warner23/3730130

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Edgerrin James26732.81
J.J. Arrington2115.50
Kurt Warner100.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +9.56.3%7.4%3.2%5.0%3.3%3.1%

Positive margins favour Cardinals; negative favour 49ers.

Half-point at risk

3.28%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

63.3%

Expected total

43.6est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+2.59
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment+0.21
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+5.37