Closing spread
CLE -1
Total
33.5
Model margin
+6.0est.
OAK perspective
Push chance
1.9%est.
Win probability
- Raiders
- Browns
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
The rivalry
OAK lead 8–7 since 1999
Meetings average 38.6 points. OAK are 6-9 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | CLE–OAK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LV | Q1 15:00 | 9 | 29 | Punt | 0–0 |
| CLE | Q1 10:27 | 5 | 11 | Opp touchdown | 0–7 |
| CLE | Q1 7:50 | 4 | 23 | Punt | 0–7 |
| LV | Q1 6:16 | 9 | 10 | Punt | 0–7 |
| CLE | Q1 2:53 | 1 | 0 | Turnover | 0–7 |
| LV | Q1 2:43 | 6 | 8 | Turnover | 0–7 |
| CLE | Q1 0:17 | 6 | 10 | Missed field goal | 0–7 |
| LV | Q2 11:30 | 5 | 55 | Touchdown | 0–14 |
| CLE | Q2 10:16 | 8 | 26 | Field goal | 3–14 |
| LV | Q2 5:08 | 2 | 63 | Touchdown | 3–21 |
| CLE | Q2 4:08 | 7 | 43 | Touchdown | 10–21 |
| LV | Q2 0:58 | 4 | 16 | Punt | 10–21 |
| CLE | Q2 0:08 | 0 | 0 | End of half | 10–21 |
| CLE | Q3 15:00 | 14 | 69 | Touchdown | 17–21 |
| LV | Q3 8:03 | 3 | 4 | Punt | 17–21 |
| CLE | Q3 6:55 | 3 | 2 | Punt | 17–21 |
| LV | Q3 5:14 | 3 | -4 | Punt | 17–21 |
| CLE | Q3 3:09 | 4 | 17 | Touchdown | 24–21 |
| LV | Q3 1:40 | 11 | 54 | Turnover on downs | 24–21 |
| CLE | Q4 11:17 | 13 | 55 | Turnover | 24–21 |
| LV | Q4 3:58 | 3 | 5 | Punt | 24–21 |
| CLE | Q4 3:06 | 4 | 31 | End of half | 24–21 |
Box score
Individual performances
Browns
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charlie Frye | 22/32 | 192 | 3 | 2 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reuben Droughns | 25 | 100 | 4.0 | 0 |
| Jason Wright | 2 | 9 | 4.5 | 0 |
| Charlie Frye | 5 | -2 | -0.4 | 0 |
| Jerome Harrison | 3 | -3 | -1.0 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Raiders; negative favour Browns.
Half-point at risk
1.92%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
64.8%
Expected total
43.2est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+2.85
- Home-field advantage+2.56
- Quarterback adjustment0.00
- Rest differential+0.56
- Expected margin+5.97
One or both ratings are carry-over priors — no games have been played this season yet, so treat this as a starting assumption rather than a read.