2006 · Week 7

Final

Vikings

Minnesota

QB Brad Johnson

31·13

Seahawks

Seattle

QB Matt Hasselbeck

Qwest Field · outdoors · fieldturf · 60°F · wind 5mph

Closing spread

SEA -6

Total

40

Model margin

+3.0est.

SEA perspective

Push chance

3.1%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Seahawks
  • Vikings

How each play moved the game.

Seahawks winsVikings wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Vikingsedge mapSeahawks
  • -0.151EPA / play-0.075
  • 39.3%Success rate40.2%
  • -0.174EPA / dropback-0.031
  • -0.117EPA / rush-0.130
  • 8.0%Explosive rate8.2%
  • +1.13CPOE-1.93
  • 33.2%Third-down rate37.5%
  • 45.1%Red-zone TD rate55.0%
  • 0.99Points / drive1.49
  • 2.9%Turnover rate3.2%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

SEA lead 10–5 since 1999

Meetings average 46.5 points. SEA are 8-7 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W13MIN @ SEA026SEA
2024 · W16MIN @ SEA2724MIN
2021 · W3SEA @ MIN1730MIN
2020 · W5MIN @ SEA2627SEA
2019 · W13MIN @ SEA3037SEA
2018 · W14MIN @ SEA721SEA
2015 · playoffsSEA @ MIN109SEA
2015 · W13SEA @ MIN387SEA

Box score

Individual performances

Vikings

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Brad Johnson15/2417110
Mewelde Moore1/11510

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Chester Taylor261696.51
Bethel Johnson144.00
Brad Johnson320.70

Seahawks

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Seneca Wallace14/2513402
Matt Hasselbeck7/1712710

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Maurice Morris17492.90
Seneca Wallace210.50
Deion Branch100.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +63.9%6.9%7.5%3.1%4.8%3.1%2.7%

Positive margins favour Seahawks; negative favour Vikings.

Half-point at risk

3.13%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

57.3%

Expected total

41.5est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+1.05
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential-0.56
  • Expected margin+3.05