2006 · Week 12

Final

Cardinals

Arizona

QB Matt Leinart

26·31

Vikings

Minnesota

QB Brad Johnson

Hubert H. Humphrey Metrodome · dome · fieldturf

Closing spread

MIN -7

Total

39

Model margin

+1.0est.

MIN perspective

Push chance

4.6%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Vikings
  • Cardinals

How each play moved the game.

Vikings winsCardinals wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Cardinalsedge mapVikings
  • -0.045EPA / play-0.151
  • 42.0%Success rate39.3%
  • +0.036EPA / dropback-0.174
  • -0.164EPA / rush-0.117
  • 7.2%Explosive rate8.0%
  • -3.07CPOE+1.13
  • 39.4%Third-down rate33.2%
  • 53.4%Red-zone TD rate45.1%
  • 1.52Points / drive0.99
  • 2.7%Turnover rate2.9%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

MIN lead 10–4 since 1999

MIN have won 2 straight. Meetings average 48.3 points. MIN are 7-5-2 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2024 · W13ARI @ MIN2223MIN
2022 · W8ARI @ MIN2634MIN
2021 · W2MIN @ ARI3334ARI
2018 · W6ARI @ MIN1727MIN
2016 · W11ARI @ MIN2430MIN
2015 · W14MIN @ ARI2023ARI
2012 · W7ARI @ MIN1421MIN
2011 · W5ARI @ MIN1034MIN

Box score

Individual performances

Cardinals

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Matt Leinart31/5140512

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Edgerrin James4153.80
Obafemi Ayanbadejo122.00
Matt Leinart100.00

Vikings

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Brad Johnson27/4127130

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Chester Taylor271365.01
Brad Johnson3155.00
Mewelde Moore2105.00
Ciatrick Fason1-4-4.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +74.2%2.8%7.2%7.4%3.0%4.6%2.8%

Positive margins favour Vikings; negative favour Cardinals.

Half-point at risk

4.56%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

51.9%

Expected total

41.9est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-1.53
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+1.04