Task Enterprises presentsNFL Intelligence

2024 · Week 13

Final

Cardinals

Arizona

QB Kyler Murray

22·23

Vikings

Minnesota

QB Sam Darnold

U.S. Bank Stadium · dome · sportturf

Closing spread

MIN -3.5

Total

45.5

Model margin

+1.7est.

MIN perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Vikings
  • Cardinals

How each play moved the game.

Vikings winsCardinals wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Cardinalsedge mapVikings
  • +0.067EPA / play+0.038
  • 47.3%Success rate46.3%
  • +0.126EPA / dropback+0.135
  • -0.023EPA / rush-0.119
  • 10.0%Explosive rate9.6%
  • +2.11CPOE+4.00
  • 43.0%Third-down rate39.7%
  • 60.3%Red-zone TD rate63.1%
  • 2.31Points / drive2.09
  • 1.8%Turnover rate1.8%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

MIN lead 10–4 since 1999

MIN have won 2 straight. Meetings average 48.3 points. MIN are 7-5-2 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2022 · W8ARI @ MIN2634MIN
2021 · W2MIN @ ARI3334ARI
2018 · W6ARI @ MIN1727MIN
2016 · W11ARI @ MIN2430MIN
2015 · W14MIN @ ARI2023ARI
2012 · W7ARI @ MIN1421MIN
2011 · W5ARI @ MIN1034MIN
2010 · W9ARI @ MIN2427MIN

Box score

Individual performances

Cardinals

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Kyler Murray31/4526012

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
James Conner17684.00
Kyler Murray7486.90
Trey Benson3206.70
Emari Demercado3124.00
Greg Dortch166.00

Vikings

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Sam Darnold21/3123520

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Aaron Jones5224.40
Sam Darnold4225.50
Cam Akers4225.50
Ty Chandler221.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +3.54.1%2.8%7.1%7.5%3.1%4.6%2.9%

Positive margins favour Vikings; negative favour Cardinals.

Half-point at risk

2.52%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

53.7%

Expected total

44.9est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+0.03
  • Home-field advantage+1.71
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+1.74