Task Enterprises presentsNFL Intelligence

2015 · Week 14

Final

Vikings

Minnesota

QB Teddy Bridgewater

20·23

Cardinals

Arizona

QB Carson Palmer

University of Phoenix Stadium · open · grass

Closing spread

ARI -10

Total

46.5

Model margin

+3.5est.

ARI perspective

Push chance

3.1%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Cardinals
  • Vikings

How each play moved the game.

Cardinals winsVikings wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Vikingsedge mapCardinals
  • +0.022EPA / play+0.133
  • 40.7%Success rate47.7%
  • +0.050EPA / dropback+0.260
  • -0.013EPA / rush-0.059
  • 9.6%Explosive rate10.8%
  • +2.87CPOE+4.51
  • 39.2%Third-down rate47.4%
  • 57.3%Red-zone TD rate61.1%
  • 1.94Points / drive2.34
  • 1.6%Turnover rate2.1%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

MIN lead 10–4 since 1999

MIN have won 2 straight. Meetings average 48.3 points. ARI are 5-7-2 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2024 · W13ARI @ MIN2223MIN
2022 · W8ARI @ MIN2634MIN
2021 · W2MIN @ ARI3334ARI
2018 · W6ARI @ MIN1727MIN
2016 · W11ARI @ MIN2430MIN
2012 · W7ARI @ MIN1421MIN
2011 · W5ARI @ MIN1034MIN
2010 · W9ARI @ MIN2427MIN

Box score

Individual performances

Vikings

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Teddy Bridgewater25/3633510

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Adrian Peterson23693.01
Teddy Bridgewater133.00

Cardinals

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Carson Palmer25/3531020

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
David Johnson19924.80
Carson Palmer331.00
Kerwynn Williams620.30
Stepfan Taylor100.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +106.8%7.5%3.1%4.8%3.1%2.8%

Positive margins favour Cardinals; negative favour Vikings.

Half-point at risk

3.12%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

58.4%

Expected total

44.6est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+1.01
  • Home-field advantage+2.49
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+3.50