2006 · Week 14 · Division

Final

Seahawks

Seattle

QB Matt Hasselbeck

21·27

Cardinals

Arizona

QB Matt Leinart

University of Phoenix Stadium · closed · grass

Closing spread

SEA -3

Total

44.5

Model margin

+3.0est.

ARI perspective

Push chance

6.9%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Cardinals
  • Seahawks

How each play moved the game.

Cardinals winsSeahawks wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Seahawksedge mapCardinals
  • -0.075EPA / play-0.045
  • 40.2%Success rate42.0%
  • -0.031EPA / dropback+0.036
  • -0.130EPA / rush-0.164
  • 8.2%Explosive rate7.2%
  • -1.93CPOE-3.07
  • 37.5%Third-down rate39.4%
  • 55.0%Red-zone TD rate53.4%
  • 1.49Points / drive1.52
  • 3.2%Turnover rate2.7%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

SEA lead 30–17–1 since 1999

SEA have won 9 straight. Meetings average 43.5 points. ARI are 21-26-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W10ARI @ SEA2244SEA
2025 · W4SEA @ ARI2320SEA
2024 · W14SEA @ ARI3018SEA
2024 · W12ARI @ SEA616SEA
2023 · W18SEA @ ARI2120SEA
2023 · W7ARI @ SEA1020SEA
2022 · W9SEA @ ARI3121SEA
2022 · W6ARI @ SEA919SEA

Box score

Individual performances

Seahawks

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Matt Hasselbeck20/2824330

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Shaun Alexander22763.50
Matt Hasselbeck33210.70
Maurice Morris4123.00

Cardinals

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Matt Leinart21/3423221

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Edgerrin James261154.41
Obafemi Ayanbadejo133.00
Marcel Shipp210.50
J.J. Arrington2-3-1.50
Matt Leinart2-3-1.50

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line -33.9%6.9%7.5%3.1%4.8%3.1%

Positive margins favour Cardinals; negative favour Seahawks.

Half-point at risk

6.87%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

57.2%

Expected total

43.6est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+0.48
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+3.04