2006 · Week 16

Final / OT

Commanders

Washington

QB Jason Campbell

31·37

Rams

St. Louis

QB Marc Bulger

Edward Jones Dome · dome · fieldturf

Closing spread

STL -1

Total

43

Model margin

+4.3est.

STL perspective

Push chance

2.1%est.

Win probability

  • Rams
  • Commanders

How each play moved the game.

Rams winsCommanders wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

The rivalry

All square 7–7 since 1999

RAMS have won 2 straight. Meetings average 40.6 points. STL are 8-6 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2023 · W15WAS @ LA20–28RAMS
2020 · W5LA @ WAS30–10RAMS
2017 · W2WAS @ LA27–20WAS
2015 · W2STL @ WAS10–24WAS
2014 · W14STL @ WAS24–0RAMS
2012 · W2WAS @ STL28–31RAMS
2011 · W4WAS @ STL17–10WAS
2010 · W3WAS @ STL16–30RAMS

Possession by possession

How it unfolded

Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.

Drive-by-drive log
BallStartPlaysYardsResultWAS–STL
LAQ1 15:00623Punt0–0
WASQ1 12:181078Touchdown7–0
LAQ1 6:4130Punt7–0
WASQ1 5:11729Punt7–0
LAQ1 1:53942Touchdown7–7
WASQ2 12:5532Punt7–7
LAQ2 11:52483Touchdown7–14
WASQ2 9:4931Punt7–14
LAQ2 8:523-1Punt7–14
WASQ2 6:5928Touchdown14–14
LAQ2 6:14432Punt14–14
WASQ2 3:491076Touchdown21–14
LAQ2 0:2112End of half21–14
WASQ3 15:001267Touchdown28–14
LAQ3 8:49582Touchdown28–21
WASQ3 6:3032Punt28–21
LAQ3 4:54769Touchdown28–28
WASQ3 1:49422Punt28–28
LAQ3 0:141397Field goal28–31
WASQ4 7:5733Punt28–31
LAQ4 6:1237Turnover28–31
WASQ4 4:3640Field goal31–31
LAQ4 3:2139Punt31–31
WASQ4 2:20239Turnover31–31
LAQ4 2:02766Missed field goal31–31
LAOT531Punt31–31
WASOT39Punt31–31
LAOT539Touchdown31–37

Box score

Individual performances

Commanders

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Jason Campbell13/2616010

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Ladell Betts291294.42
Antwaan Randle El22110.50
T.J. Duckett5183.61
Jason Campbell177.00
Mike Sellers111.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +13.6%6.6%7.5%3.2%4.9%3.2%2.9%

Positive margins favour Rams; negative favour Commanders.

Half-point at risk

2.11%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

60.4%

Expected total

45.9est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+1.32
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment+0.38
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+4.26

One or both ratings are carry-over priors — no games have been played this season yet, so treat this as a starting assumption rather than a read.