Closing spread
STL -1
Total
43
Model margin
+2.8est.
MIN perspective
Push chance
2.1%est.
Win probability
- Vikings
- Rams
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
The rivalry
STL lead 8–6 since 1999
RAMS have won 4 straight. Meetings average 53.3 points. MIN are 7-7 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | STL–MIN |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIN | Q1 15:00 | 3 | 7 | Opp touchdown | 7–0 |
| MIN | Q1 13:38 | 3 | 1 | Punt | 7–0 |
| LA | Q1 11:57 | 11 | 77 | Field goal | 10–0 |
| MIN | Q1 6:44 | 10 | 62 | Touchdown | 10–7 |
| LA | Q1 2:04 | 3 | 0 | Punt | 10–7 |
| MIN | Q1 1:34 | 3 | 4 | Punt | 10–7 |
| LA | Q1 0:05 | 3 | 8 | Punt | 10–7 |
| MIN | Q2 14:03 | 7 | 38 | Turnover | 10–7 |
| LA | Q2 10:37 | 6 | 53 | Touchdown | 17–7 |
| MIN | Q2 8:12 | 3 | 9 | Punt | 17–7 |
| LA | Q2 6:19 | 11 | 74 | Touchdown | 24–7 |
| MIN | Q2 1:15 | 5 | 39 | End of half | 24–7 |
| LA | Q3 15:00 | 6 | 27 | Field goal | 27–7 |
| MIN | Q3 11:24 | 3 | 7 | Punt | 27–7 |
| LA | Q3 10:20 | 12 | 73 | Touchdown | 34–7 |
| MIN | Q3 4:16 | 6 | 24 | Punt | 34–7 |
| LA | Q3 1:48 | 3 | 8 | Punt | 34–7 |
| MIN | Q3 1:01 | 5 | 13 | Punt | 34–7 |
| LA | Q4 13:32 | 4 | 86 | Touchdown | 41–7 |
| MIN | Q4 11:09 | 4 | 3 | Touchdown | 41–14 |
| LA | Q4 9:28 | 3 | 1 | Punt | 41–14 |
| MIN | Q4 6:59 | 10 | 86 | Touchdown | 41–21 |
| LA | Q4 2:21 | 4 | 11 | End of half | 41–21 |
Box score
Individual performances
Vikings
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tarvaris Jackson | 20/34 | 213 | 1 | 2 |
| Brad Johnson | 1/1 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tarvaris Jackson | 7 | 34 | 4.9 | 1 |
| Chester Taylor | 13 | 29 | 2.2 | 1 |
| Mewelde Moore | 1 | 10 | 10.0 | 0 |
| Artose Pinner | 1 | 9 | 9.0 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Vikings; negative favour Rams.
Half-point at risk
2.09%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
56.6%
Expected total
42.0est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-0.72
- Home-field advantage+2.56
- Quarterback adjustment+0.73
- Rest differential+0.24
- Expected margin+2.82
One or both ratings are carry-over priors — no games have been played this season yet, so treat this as a starting assumption rather than a read.