Task Enterprises presentsNFL Intelligence

2018 · Week 4

Final

Vikings

Minnesota

QB Kirk Cousins

31·38

Rams

Los Angeles

QB Jared Goff

Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum · outdoors · grass · 75°F · wind 3mph

Closing spread

LA -7.5

Total

48.5

Model margin

+3.0est.

LA perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Rams
  • Vikings

How each play moved the game.

Rams winsVikings wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Vikingsedge mapRams
  • -0.075EPA / play+0.149
  • 43.2%Success rate50.8%
  • -0.011EPA / dropback+0.203
  • -0.203EPA / rush+0.065
  • 8.0%Explosive rate12.1%
  • +2.40CPOE+1.24
  • 36.2%Third-down rate45.0%
  • 67.3%Red-zone TD rate57.8%
  • 1.57Points / drive2.63
  • 1.9%Turnover rate1.7%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

LA lead 8–6 since 1999

RAMS have won 4 straight. Meetings average 53.3 points. LA are 7-7 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2024 · playoffsMIN @ LA927RAMS
2024 · W8MIN @ LA2030RAMS
2021 · W16LA @ MIN3023RAMS
2017 · W11LA @ MIN724MIN
2015 · W9STL @ MIN1821MIN
2014 · W1MIN @ STL346MIN
2012 · W15MIN @ STL3622MIN
2009 · W5MIN @ STL3810MIN

Box score

Individual performances

Vikings

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Kirk Cousins36/5042230

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Kirk Cousins4287.00
Dalvin Cook10202.00
Roc Thomas144.00
Latavius Murray221.00

Rams

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Jared Goff26/3346550

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Todd Gurley17834.90
Brandin Cooks11010.00
Jared Goff273.50

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Cooper Kupp9111622
Brandin Cooks781161
Robert Woods551011
Todd Gurley46731
Gerald Everett11130
Tyler Higbee0100
Josh Reynolds0100

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +7.53.9%6.9%7.5%3.1%4.8%3.1%2.7%

Positive margins favour Rams; negative favour Vikings.

Half-point at risk

2.11%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

57.2%

Expected total

42.7est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+1.27
  • Home-field advantage+1.74
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+3.01