Closing spread
PHI -6.5
Total
45.5
Model margin
+4.1est.
PHI perspective
Push chance
None
half-point line — cannot push
Win probability
- Eagles
- Giants
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- -0.017EPA / play+0.055
- 45.6%Success rate43.0%
- -0.017EPA / dropback+0.117
- -0.017EPA / rush-0.049
- 9.6%Explosive rate11.1%
- -3.95CPOE-1.03
- 38.8%Third-down rate42.8%
- 62.8%Red-zone TD rate64.7%
- 1.77Points / drive1.67
- 2.5%Turnover rate2.1%
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
PHI lead 38–20 since 1999
Meetings average 43.1 points. PHI are 30-27-1 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | NYG–PHI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NYG | Q1 15:00 | 7 | 82 | Touchdown | 7–0 |
| PHI | Q1 11:44 | 3 | -6 | Punt | 7–0 |
| NYG | Q1 10:18 | 3 | 8 | Punt | 7–0 |
| PHI | Q1 9:03 | 3 | 8 | Punt | 7–0 |
| NYG | Q1 7:32 | 5 | 15 | Punt | 7–0 |
| PHI | Q1 5:10 | 3 | 8 | Punt | 7–0 |
| NYG | Q1 3:10 | 3 | -3 | Punt | 7–0 |
| PHI | Q1 1:58 | 7 | 79 | Touchdown | 7–7 |
| NYG | Q2 14:11 | 3 | 2 | Turnover | 7–7 |
| PHI | Q2 12:33 | 6 | 36 | Field goal | 7–10 |
| NYG | Q2 9:34 | 10 | 78 | Field goal | 10–10 |
| PHI | Q2 4:45 | 10 | 85 | Touchdown | 10–17 |
| NYG | Q2 1:01 | 3 | 4 | Punt | 10–17 |
| PHI | Q2 0:11 | 1 | 4 | End of half | 10–17 |
| PHI | Q3 15:00 | 4 | 4 | Punt | 10–17 |
| NYG | Q3 12:57 | 3 | -2 | Punt | 10–17 |
| PHI | Q3 10:53 | 3 | 4 | Punt | 10–17 |
| NYG | Q3 9:26 | 3 | 8 | Punt | 10–17 |
| PHI | Q3 7:12 | 9 | 45 | Field goal | 10–20 |
| NYG | Q3 2:37 | 7 | 18 | Field goal | 13–20 |
| PHI | Q4 14:50 | 6 | 10 | Punt | 13–20 |
| NYG | Q4 12:13 | 14 | 95 | Touchdown | 20–20 |
| PHI | Q4 5:04 | 9 | 46 | Field goal | 20–23 |
Box score
Individual performances
Giants
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eli Manning | 16/27 | 161 | 2 | 1 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tiki Barber | 26 | 137 | 5.3 | 0 |
| Brandon Jacobs | 2 | 8 | 4.0 | 0 |
| Eli Manning | 2 | 4 | 2.0 | 0 |
| Jared Lorenzen | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 0 |
Eagles
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeff Garcia | 17/31 | 153 | 1 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brian Westbrook | 20 | 141 | 7.0 | 1 |
| Correll Buckhalter | 6 | 17 | 2.8 | 0 |
| Jeff Garcia | 4 | 14 | 3.5 | 0 |
| Reggie Brown | 1 | 13 | 13.0 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Eagles; negative favour Giants.
Half-point at risk
4.88%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
60.0%
Expected total
46.4est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+1.69
- Home-field advantage+2.56
- Quarterback adjustment-0.06
- Rest differential-0.08
- Expected margin+4.11