2008 · Week 1 · Division

Final

Bengals

Cincinnati

QB Carson Palmer

10·17

Ravens

Baltimore

QB Joe Flacco

M&T Bank Stadium · outdoors · sportturf · 78°F · wind 7mph

Closing spread

CIN -2

Total

37.5

Model margin

+3.4est.

BAL perspective

Push chance

2.0%est.

Win probability

  • Ravens
  • Bengals

How each play moved the game.

Ravens winsBengals wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Bengalsedge mapRavens
  • -0.172EPA / play-0.018
  • 38.0%Success rate40.6%
  • -0.150EPA / dropback-0.007
  • -0.208EPA / rush-0.027
  • 5.1%Explosive rate7.9%
  • -3.29CPOE-0.33
  • 35.3%Third-down rate41.3%
  • 45.7%Red-zone TD rate50.4%
  • 0.93Points / drive1.61
  • 2.5%Turnover rate2.0%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

BAL lead 30–25 since 1999

Meetings average 43 points. BAL are 25-28-2 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W15BAL @ CIN240BAL
2025 · W13CIN @ BAL3214CIN
2024 · W10CIN @ BAL3435BAL
2024 · W5BAL @ CIN4138BAL
2023 · W11CIN @ BAL2034BAL
2023 · W2BAL @ CIN2724BAL
2022 · playoffsBAL @ CIN1724CIN
2022 · W18BAL @ CIN1627CIN

Box score

Individual performances

Bengals

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Carson Palmer10/259901

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Chris Perry18372.10
Carson Palmer3155.00
Kenny Watson2136.50

Ravens

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Joe Flacco15/2912900

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Ray Rice22642.90
Mark Clayton14242.01
Joe Flacco4379.31

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line -23.8%6.8%7.5%3.1%4.8%3.1%

Positive margins favour Ravens; negative favour Bengals.

Half-point at risk

1.99%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

58.3%

Expected total

39.9est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+3.43
  • Home-field advantage+2.49
  • Quarterback adjustment-2.49
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+3.43