Task Enterprises presentsNFL Intelligence

2008 · Week 3

Final

Cardinals

Arizona

QB Kurt Warner

17·24

Commanders

Washington

QB Jason Campbell

FedExField · outdoors · grass · 75°F · wind 1mph

Closing spread

WAS -3

Total

43.5

Model margin

+2.8est.

WAS perspective

Push chance

7.5%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Commanders
  • Cardinals

How each play moved the game.

Commanders winsCardinals wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Cardinalsedge mapCommanders
  • +0.052EPA / play-0.032
  • 45.0%Success rate42.3%
  • +0.144EPA / dropback+0.004
  • -0.140EPA / rush-0.080
  • 8.6%Explosive rate7.5%
  • +5.02CPOE-1.49
  • 43.3%Third-down rate36.0%
  • 58.6%Red-zone TD rate55.0%
  • 2.12Points / drive1.37
  • 2.8%Turnover rate1.6%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

WAS lead 14–4 since 1999

WAS have won 2 straight. Meetings average 38.9 points. WAS are 10-8 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2024 · W4WAS @ ARI4214WAS
2023 · W1ARI @ WAS1620WAS
2020 · W2WAS @ ARI1530ARI
2018 · W1WAS @ ARI246WAS
2017 · W15ARI @ WAS1520WAS
2016 · W13WAS @ ARI2331ARI
2014 · W6WAS @ ARI2030ARI
2011 · W2ARI @ WAS2122WAS

Box score

Individual performances

Cardinals

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Kurt Warner16/3019221
Jerheme Urban1/11800

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Edgerrin James18935.20
Tim Hightower5234.60

Commanders

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Jason Campbell22/3019320
Antwaan Randle El1/11100

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Clinton Portis21683.21
Jason Campbell4266.50
Ladell Betts4235.80
Devin Thomas11616.00
Mike Sellers133.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +33.9%2.6%6.9%7.5%3.1%4.8%3.0%2.7%

Positive margins favour Commanders; negative favour Cardinals.

Half-point at risk

7.52%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

56.6%

Expected total

43.1est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+0.33
  • Home-field advantage+2.49
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+2.82