2008 · Week 9 · Division

Final

Cardinals

Arizona

QB Kurt Warner

34·13

Rams

St. Louis

QB Marc Bulger

Edward Jones Dome · dome · fieldturf

Closing spread

ARI -3

Total

49.5

Model margin

+3.2est.

STL perspective

Push chance

6.8%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Rams
  • Cardinals

How each play moved the game.

Rams winsCardinals wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

The rivalry

STL lead 29–21 since 1999

Meetings average 42.8 points. STL are 25-24-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2026 · W6ARI @ LA18–16ARI
2025 · W18ARI @ LA20–37RAMS
2025 · W14LA @ ARI45–17RAMS
2024 · W17ARI @ LA9–13RAMS
2024 · W2LA @ ARI10–41ARI
2023 · W12LA @ ARI37–14RAMS
2023 · W6ARI @ LA9–26RAMS
2022 · W10ARI @ LA27–17ARI

Possession by possession

How it unfolded

Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.

Drive-by-drive log
BallStartPlaysYardsResultARI–STL
ARIQ1 15:001473Turnover on downs0–0
LAQ1 7:50614Punt0–0
ARIQ1 5:4032Punt0–6
LAQ1 4:34180Touchdown0–7
ARIQ1 4:23529Punt0–7
LAQ1 1:25410Punt0–7
ARIQ2 14:43619Punt6–7
LAQ2 12:2110Opp touchdown7–7
LAQ2 12:1050Turnover7–7
ARIQ2 9:1535Field goal10–7
LAQ2 8:09616Punt10–7
ARIQ2 4:436102Touchdown17–7
LAQ2 1:5330Punt17–7
ARIQ2 1:18256Touchdown24–7
LAQ2 0:4232Punt24–7
ARIQ2 0:08247End of half24–7
LAQ3 15:00524Turnover on downs24–7
ARIQ3 12:454-7Punt24–7
LAQ3 10:31615Punt24–7
ARIQ3 8:17882Touchdown31–7
LAQ3 3:16518Punt31–7
ARIQ3 1:0745Punt31–7
LAQ4 14:05520Touchdown31–13
ARIQ4 12:171280Field goal34–13
LAQ4 3:27532Turnover34–13
ARIQ4 2:15219End of half34–13

Box score

Individual performances

Cardinals

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Kurt Warner23/3434220

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Tim Hightower221095.01
J.J. Arrington66210.30
Anquan Boldin284.00
Kurt Warner3-2-0.70

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line -33.8%6.8%7.5%3.1%4.8%3.1%

Positive margins favour Rams; negative favour Cardinals.

Half-point at risk

6.84%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

57.7%

Expected total

44.6est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+0.74
  • Home-field advantage+2.49
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+3.23

One or both ratings are carry-over priors — no games have been played this season yet, so treat this as a starting assumption rather than a read.