Task Enterprises presentsNFL Intelligence

2023 · Week 6 · Division

Final

Cardinals

Arizona

QB Joshua Dobbs

9·26

Rams

Los Angeles

QB Matthew Stafford

SoFi Stadium · dome · matrixturf

Closing spread

LA -7

Total

48

Model margin

+6.8est.

LA perspective

Push chance

5.0%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Rams
  • Cardinals

How each play moved the game.

Rams winsCardinals wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Cardinalsedge mapRams
  • -0.055EPA / play+0.042
  • 41.0%Success rate44.9%
  • -0.082EPA / dropback+0.085
  • -0.014EPA / rush-0.022
  • 9.3%Explosive rate9.4%
  • -2.77CPOE-3.54
  • 39.6%Third-down rate41.4%
  • 62.4%Red-zone TD rate64.2%
  • 1.88Points / drive2.13
  • 1.5%Turnover rate1.5%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

LA lead 29–20 since 1999

RAMS have won 3 straight. Meetings average 43 points. LA are 25-23-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W18ARI @ LA2037RAMS
2025 · W14LA @ ARI4517RAMS
2024 · W17ARI @ LA913RAMS
2024 · W2LA @ ARI1041ARI
2023 · W12LA @ ARI3714RAMS
2022 · W10ARI @ LA2717ARI
2022 · W3LA @ ARI2012RAMS
2021 · playoffsARI @ LA1134RAMS

Box score

Individual performances

Cardinals

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Joshua Dobbs21/4123501

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Joshua Dobbs7476.70
Keaontay Ingram10404.00
Damien Williams8364.50
Emari Demercado2115.50
Rondale Moore3-4-1.30

Rams

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Matthew Stafford15/2422610

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Kyren Williams201587.91
Zach Evans4102.50
Ronnie Rivers393.00
Matthew Stafford122.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Cooper Kupp791481
Tutu Atwell11300
Puka Nacua47260
Tyler Higbee23180
Ronnie Rivers1140

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +73.1%5.9%7.3%3.2%5.0%3.4%3.2%2.6%

Positive margins favour Rams; negative favour Cardinals.

Half-point at risk

4.99%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

66.9%

Expected total

47.2est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+2.20
  • Home-field advantage+1.71
  • Quarterback adjustment+2.89
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+6.80