Closing spread
LA -12.5
Total
51.5
Model margin
+6.3est.
LA perspective
Push chance
None
half-point line — cannot push
Availability
The injury report
The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.
Cardinals
- OutAndrew WingardSKnee· DNP
- OutJeremiyah LoveRBAnkle· DNP
- OutWydett Williams Jr.SConcussion· DNP
- QuestionableBlake GillikinPBack· Limited
- QuestionableBudda BakerSNot injury related - resting player· DNP
- QuestionableKitan CrawfordSAnkle· Limited
- QuestionableZaven CollinsLBHip· DNP
- LimitedCarson BeckQBBack
- LimitedDevin DuvernayWRRibs
Rams
- QuestionableKam CurlSAnkle· DNP
- QuestionableTrent McDuffieCBGroin· DNP
- DNPByron YoungLBNot injury related - resting player
- DNPTyler HigbeeTENot injury related - resting player
- LimitedDavis AllenTEFoot
Win probability
- Rams
- Cardinals
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- -0.007EPA / play+0.047
- 44.1%Success rate48.7%
- +0.027EPA / dropback+0.094
- -0.072EPA / rush-0.031
- 5.2%Explosive rate7.9%
- +0.66CPOE+0.50
- 39.0%Third-down rate44.3%
- 52.3%Red-zone TD rate66.5%
- 1.94Points / drive2.15
- 1.4%Turnover rate2.2%
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
LA lead 29–21 since 1999
Meetings average 42.8 points. LA are 25-24-1 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | ARI–LA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LA | Q1 15:00 | 3 | 9 | Punt | 0–0 |
| ARI | Q1 13:35 | 3 | 5 | Turnover | 0–0 |
| LA | Q1 12:18 | 5 | 6 | Field goal | 0–3 |
| ARI | Q1 9:41 | 7 | 37 | Field goal | 3–3 |
| LA | Q1 5:37 | 3 | 8 | Punt | 3–3 |
| ARI | Q1 4:09 | 9 | 68 | Field goal | 6–3 |
| LA | Q2 14:51 | 12 | 68 | Touchdown | 6–9 |
| ARI | Q2 8:23 | 3 | 6 | Punt | 6–9 |
| LA | Q2 6:48 | 3 | 4 | Punt | 6–9 |
| ARI | Q2 5:20 | 11 | 64 | Field goal | 9–9 |
| LA | Q2 0:46 | 2 | 12 | End of half | 9–9 |
| ARI | Q3 15:00 | 15 | 66 | Field goal | 12–9 |
| LA | Q3 6:25 | 9 | 41 | Turnover on downs | 12–9 |
| ARI | Q3 2:39 | 14 | 63 | Field goal | 15–9 |
| LA | Q4 9:28 | 5 | 14 | Turnover | 15–9 |
| ARI | Q4 7:57 | 3 | 4 | Punt | 15–9 |
| LA | Q4 6:55 | 7 | 33 | Turnover on downs | 15–9 |
| ARI | Q4 3:17 | 3 | 0 | Punt | 15–9 |
| LA | Q4 2:48 | 8 | 91 | Touchdown | 15–16 |
| ARI | Q4 0:47 | 4 | 25 | Field goal | 18–16 |
Box score
Individual performances
Cardinals
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jacoby Brissett | 24/35 | 218 | 0 | 1 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bam Knight | 15 | 80 | 5.3 | 0 |
| Tyler Allgeier | 18 | 38 | 2.1 | 0 |
| Jacoby Brissett | 2 | 2 | 1.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trey McBride | 7 | 9 | 53 | 0 |
| Kendrick Bourne | 5 | 8 | 47 | 0 |
| Michael Wilson | 4 | 7 | 32 | 0 |
| Jalen Brooks | 2 | 3 | 30 | 0 |
| Elijah Higgins | 3 | 3 | 28 | 0 |
| Bam Knight | 2 | 2 | 18 | 0 |
| Tyler Allgeier | 1 | 2 | 10 | 0 |
Rams
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matthew Stafford | 25/33 | 222 | 2 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kyren Williams | 10 | 50 | 5.0 | 0 |
| Blake Corum | 9 | 42 | 4.7 | 0 |
| Davis Allen | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Puka Nacua | 6 | 7 | 80 | 0 |
| Davante Adams | 3 | 4 | 39 | 0 |
| Colby Parkinson | 5 | 6 | 31 | 1 |
| Tyler Higbee | 4 | 4 | 22 | 0 |
| Blake Corum | 2 | 2 | 18 | 1 |
| Kyren Williams | 3 | 6 | 17 | 0 |
| Konata Mumpfield | 2 | 3 | 15 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Rams; negative favour Cardinals.
Half-point at risk
1.89%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
65.6%
Expected total
44.8est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+4.15
- Home-field advantage+2.22
- Quarterback adjustment0.00
- Rest differential-0.08
- Expected margin+6.29



