2008 · Week 12

Final

Bears

Chicago

QB Kyle Orton

27·3

Rams

St. Louis

QB Marc Bulger

Edward Jones Dome · dome · fieldturf

Closing spread

CHI -7

Total

44.5

Model margin

+3.8est.

STL perspective

Push chance

3.7%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Rams
  • Bears

How each play moved the game.

Rams winsBears wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

The rivalry

STL lead 8–7 since 1999

Meetings average 40 points. STL are 6-9 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · playoffsLA @ CHI20–17RAMS
2024 · W4LA @ CHI18–24CHI
2021 · W1CHI @ LA14–34RAMS
2020 · W7CHI @ LA10–24RAMS
2019 · W11CHI @ LA7–17RAMS
2018 · W14LA @ CHI6–15CHI
2015 · W10CHI @ STL37–13CHI
2013 · W12CHI @ STL21–42RAMS

Possession by possession

How it unfolded

Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.

Drive-by-drive log
BallStartPlaysYardsResultCHI–STL
CHIQ1 15:00449Touchdown7–0
LAQ1 13:055-5Punt7–0
CHIQ1 9:57517Punt7–0
LAQ1 6:553-12Punt7–0
CHIQ1 4:54763Touchdown14–0
LAQ1 1:4441Missed field goal14–0
CHIQ2 14:55529Turnover14–0
LAQ2 12:25620Turnover on downs14–0
CHIQ2 10:03251Touchdown21–0
LAQ2 9:22859Field goal21–3
CHIQ2 5:01854Field goal24–3
LAQ2 1:3830Punt24–3
CHIQ2 0:5434Punt24–3
LAQ2 0:1000End of half24–3
LAQ3 15:00623Punt24–3
CHIQ3 10:533-1Punt24–3
LAQ3 8:58314Turnover24–3
CHIQ3 7:59615Field goal27–3
LAQ3 5:13333Turnover27–3
CHIQ3 3:33712Punt27–3
LAQ4 14:521258Turnover27–3
CHIQ4 9:28831Punt27–3
LAQ4 5:3110Turnover27–3
CHIQ4 5:2428Turnover27–3
LAQ4 4:44617Punt27–3
CHIQ4 1:5123End of half27–3

Box score

Individual performances

Bears

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Kyle Orton18/2913910

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Matt Forte201326.62
Adrian Peterson5357.00
Devin Hester23216.00
Garrett Wolfe351.70
Kyle Orton1-1-1.00
Rashied Davis1-2-2.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line -73.7%6.7%7.5%3.2%4.9%

Positive margins favour Rams; negative favour Bears.

Half-point at risk

3.73%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

59.3%

Expected total

43.8est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+1.32
  • Home-field advantage+2.49
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+3.81

One or both ratings are carry-over priors — no games have been played this season yet, so treat this as a starting assumption rather than a read.