Closing spread
BAL -7
Total
35.5
Model margin
-0.7est.
CIN perspective
Push chance
4.5%est.
the line sits on a key number
Win probability
- Bengals
- Ravens
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- -0.018EPA / play-0.172
- 40.6%Success rate38.0%
- -0.007EPA / dropback-0.150
- -0.027EPA / rush-0.208
- 7.9%Explosive rate5.1%
- -0.33CPOE-3.29
- 41.3%Third-down rate35.3%
- 50.4%Red-zone TD rate45.7%
- 1.61Points / drive0.93
- 2.0%Turnover rate2.5%
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
BAL lead 30–26 since 1999
Meetings average 43.1 points. CIN are 29-25-2 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | BAL–CIN |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIN | Q1 15:00 | 4 | 19 | Punt | 0–0 |
| BAL | Q1 13:31 | 8 | 23 | Punt | 0–0 |
| CIN | Q1 9:43 | 3 | 2 | Punt | 0–0 |
| BAL | Q1 8:45 | 6 | 56 | Field goal | 3–0 |
| CIN | Q1 6:06 | 3 | -6 | Punt | 3–0 |
| BAL | Q1 4:34 | 12 | 55 | Field goal | 6–0 |
| CIN | Q2 12:52 | 3 | 7 | Punt | 6–0 |
| BAL | Q2 11:12 | 3 | 9 | Punt | 6–0 |
| CIN | Q2 9:24 | 3 | 7 | Punt | 6–0 |
| BAL | Q2 7:54 | 9 | 80 | Touchdown | 13–0 |
| CIN | Q2 3:06 | 3 | -9 | Punt | 13–0 |
| BAL | Q2 2:11 | 5 | 25 | Punt | 13–0 |
| CIN | Q2 1:11 | 6 | 89 | Field goal | 13–3 |
| BAL | Q3 15:00 | 5 | 20 | Punt | 13–3 |
| CIN | Q3 12:11 | 3 | 7 | Punt | 13–3 |
| BAL | Q3 10:35 | 5 | 49 | Touchdown | 20–3 |
| CIN | Q3 8:12 | 3 | 4 | Punt | 20–3 |
| BAL | Q3 6:36 | 2 | 73 | Touchdown | 27–3 |
| CIN | Q3 5:53 | 3 | -7 | Punt | 27–3 |
| BAL | Q3 4:40 | 12 | 48 | Punt | 27–3 |
| CIN | Q4 14:16 | 6 | 12 | Punt | 27–3 |
| BAL | Q4 12:14 | 3 | 5 | Punt | 27–3 |
| CIN | Q4 10:01 | 6 | 23 | Punt | 27–3 |
| BAL | Q4 6:54 | 5 | 11 | Punt | 27–3 |
| CIN | Q4 3:20 | 2 | 7 | Opp touchdown | 34–3 |
| CIN | Q4 2:28 | 4 | 0 | Turnover on downs | 34–3 |
| BAL | Q4 1:07 | 0 | 0 | End of half | 34–3 |
Box score
Individual performances
Ravens
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joe Flacco | 19/29 | 280 | 2 | 0 |
| Mark Clayton | 1/1 | 32 | 1 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ray Rice | 11 | 41 | 3.7 | 0 |
| Joe Flacco | 3 | 15 | 5.0 | 0 |
| Troy Smith | 3 | 4 | 1.3 | 0 |
Bengals
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ryan Fitzpatrick | 12/31 | 124 | 0 | 0 |
| Jordan Palmer | 0/2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ryan Fitzpatrick | 3 | 29 | 9.7 | 0 |
| Cedric Benson | 10 | 17 | 1.7 | 0 |
| Chris Perry | 3 | 11 | 3.7 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Bengals; negative favour Ravens.
Half-point at risk
4.51%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
47.2%
Expected total
39.9est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-3.43
- Home-field advantage+2.49
- Quarterback adjustment0.00
- Rest differential+0.24
- Expected margin-0.70



