2010 · Week 9

Final

Dolphins

Miami

QB Chad Henne

10·26

Ravens

Baltimore

QB Joe Flacco

M&T Bank Stadium · outdoors · fieldturf · 50°F · wind 11mph

Closing spread

BAL -5

Total

40.5

Model margin

+5.1est.

BAL perspective

Push chance

2.0%est.

Win probability

  • Ravens
  • Dolphins

How each play moved the game.

Ravens winsDolphins wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Dolphinsedge mapRavens
  • -0.071EPA / play+0.028
  • 41.7%Success rate41.8%
  • -0.016EPA / dropback+0.133
  • -0.155EPA / rush-0.102
  • 7.1%Explosive rate7.3%
  • -1.81CPOE+2.93
  • 40.4%Third-down rate38.4%
  • 64.6%Red-zone TD rate57.9%
  • 1.34Points / drive1.78
  • 2.6%Turnover rate1.7%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

BAL lead 12–7 since 1999

BAL have won 2 straight. Meetings average 41.6 points. BAL are 13-6 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W9BAL @ MIA286BAL
2023 · W17MIA @ BAL1956BAL
2022 · W2MIA @ BAL4238MIA
2021 · W10BAL @ MIA1022MIA
2019 · W1BAL @ MIA5910BAL
2017 · W8MIA @ BAL040BAL
2016 · W13MIA @ BAL638BAL
2015 · W13BAL @ MIA1315MIA

Box score

Individual performances

Dolphins

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Chad Henne22/3423103

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Ronnie Brown9596.61
Chad Henne6132.20
Ricky Williams210.50

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Brian Hartline45850
Davone Bess58500
Ronnie Brown56400
Brandon Marshall58300
Anthony Fasano37260

Ravens

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Joe Flacco20/2726620

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Ray Rice22833.80
Willis McGahee6244.00
David Reed11515.00
Joe Flacco471.80

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Ray Rice78970
Derrick Mason45421
Willis McGahee33421
T.J. Houshmandzadeh22340
Anquan Boldin27280
Todd Heap22230

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +53.5%6.4%7.4%3.2%4.9%3.3%3.0%

Positive margins favour Ravens; negative favour Dolphins.

Half-point at risk

1.97%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

62.6%

Expected total

43.5est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+2.06
  • Home-field advantage+2.49
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential+0.56
  • Expected margin+5.10