Closing spread
PIT -5
Total
41.5
Model margin
-1.4est.
CIN perspective
Push chance
1.9%est.
Availability
The injury report
The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.
Steelers
- OutAaron SmithDETriceps· DNP
Bengals
- DNPRoddrick MuckelroyLBAnkle
- DNPTank JohnsonDTKnee
- LimitedFrostee RuckerDEKnee
- LimitedKeith RiversLBFoot
Win probability
- Bengals
- Steelers
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- +0.035EPA / play-0.042
- 40.3%Success rate44.3%
- +0.166EPA / dropback+0.055
- -0.126EPA / rush-0.191
- 10.5%Explosive rate7.6%
- +3.44CPOE+0.88
- 44.1%Third-down rate39.8%
- 58.8%Red-zone TD rate55.0%
- 1.89Points / drive1.45
- 1.7%Turnover rate2.9%
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
PIT lead 41–16 since 1999
PIT have won 2 straight. Meetings average 42.4 points. CIN are 18-38-1 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | PIT–CIN |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIN | Q1 15:00 | 0 | 0 | Touchdown | 0–0 |
| PIT | Q1 14:52 | 4 | 25 | Touchdown | 7–0 |
| CIN | Q1 12:57 | 5 | 20 | Punt | 7–0 |
| PIT | Q1 10:03 | 5 | 23 | Field goal | 10–0 |
| CIN | Q1 7:46 | 3 | 2 | Punt | 10–0 |
| PIT | Q1 6:39 | 6 | 24 | Punt | 10–0 |
| CIN | Q1 2:24 | 6 | 37 | Punt | 10–0 |
| PIT | Q2 13:35 | 5 | 37 | Turnover | 10–0 |
| CIN | Q2 10:51 | 4 | 38 | Touchdown | 10–7 |
| PIT | Q2 8:46 | 3 | 1 | Punt | 10–7 |
| CIN | Q2 7:38 | 5 | 18 | Turnover | 10–7 |
| PIT | Q2 5:10 | 6 | 57 | Touchdown | 17–7 |
| CIN | Q2 2:07 | 6 | 5 | Missed field goal | 17–7 |
| PIT | Q2 0:45 | 3 | 24 | Field goal | 20–7 |
| CIN | Q2 0:05 | 0 | 0 | End of half | 20–7 |
| PIT | Q3 15:00 | 3 | -10 | Punt | 20–7 |
| CIN | Q3 12:52 | 6 | 30 | Missed field goal | 20–7 |
| PIT | Q3 8:47 | 3 | 9 | Punt | 20–7 |
| CIN | Q3 6:39 | 3 | -2 | Punt | 20–7 |
| PIT | Q3 5:26 | 3 | 6 | Punt | 20–7 |
| CIN | Q3 4:51 | 4 | 8 | Punt | 20–7 |
| PIT | Q3 2:30 | 5 | 56 | Touchdown | 27–7 |
| CIN | Q4 14:50 | 5 | 56 | Touchdown | 27–14 |
| PIT | Q4 13:12 | 5 | 20 | Turnover | 27–14 |
| CIN | Q4 10:06 | 4 | 1 | Touchdown | 27–21 |
| PIT | Q4 9:05 | 7 | 43 | Missed field goal | 27–21 |
| CIN | Q4 3:59 | 14 | 59 | Turnover on downs | 27–21 |
| PIT | Q4 0:34 | 0 | 0 | End of half | 27–21 |
Box score
Individual performances
Steelers
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ben Roethlisberger | 17/27 | 163 | 1 | 1 |
| Antwaan Randle El | 1/1 | 39 | 1 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rashard Mendenhall | 22 | 99 | 4.5 | 1 |
| Ben Roethlisberger | 5 | 13 | 2.6 | 0 |
| Mewelde Moore | 2 | 5 | 2.5 | 0 |
| Antwaan Randle El | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 0 |
| Isaac Redman | 2 | 2 | 1.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mike Wallace | 5 | 7 | 110 | 1 |
| Rashard Mendenhall | 3 | 3 | 31 | 0 |
| Heath Miller | 3 | 5 | 21 | 0 |
| Matt Spaeth | 1 | 1 | 12 | 0 |
| Hines Ward | 3 | 6 | 10 | 1 |
| Antwaan Randle El | 1 | 3 | 10 | 0 |
| Mewelde Moore | 2 | 2 | 8 | 0 |
Bengals
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carson Palmer | 22/36 | 248 | 2 | 1 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cedric Benson | 18 | 54 | 3.0 | 1 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terrell Owens | 10 | 14 | 141 | 2 |
| Jordan Shipley | 4 | 7 | 47 | 0 |
| Cedric Benson | 2 | 2 | 20 | 0 |
| Chad Johnson | 1 | 7 | 15 | 0 |
| Brian Leonard | 3 | 3 | 14 | 0 |
| Jermaine Gresham | 2 | 3 | 11 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Bengals; negative favour Steelers.
Half-point at risk
1.91%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
45.3%
Expected total
43.6est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-3.87
- Home-field advantage+2.49
- Quarterback adjustment0.00
- Rest differential0.00
- Expected margin-1.38



