2010 · Week 10 · Division

Final

Vikings

Minnesota

QB Brett Favre

13·27

Bears

Chicago

QB Jay Cutler

Soldier Field · outdoors · grass · 44°F · wind 22mph

Closing spread

CHI -1

Total

41

Model margin

+2.7est.

CHI perspective

Push chance

2.1%est.

Win probability

  • Bears
  • Vikings

How each play moved the game.

Bears winsVikings wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Vikingsedge mapBears
  • -0.112EPA / play-0.097
  • 42.3%Success rate39.0%
  • -0.105EPA / dropback-0.053
  • -0.121EPA / rush-0.166
  • 9.3%Explosive rate8.3%
  • -2.30CPOE+0.87
  • 34.1%Third-down rate33.1%
  • 48.7%Red-zone TD rate47.3%
  • 1.25Points / drive1.43
  • 3.5%Turnover rate3.2%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

MIN lead 28–26 since 1999

Meetings average 41.8 points. CHI are 30-23-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W11CHI @ MIN1917CHI
2025 · W1MIN @ CHI2724MIN
2024 · W15CHI @ MIN1230MIN
2024 · W12MIN @ CHI3027MIN
2023 · W12CHI @ MIN1210CHI
2023 · W6MIN @ CHI1913MIN
2022 · W18MIN @ CHI2913MIN
2022 · W5CHI @ MIN2229MIN

Box score

Individual performances

Vikings

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Brett Favre18/3117013

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Adrian Peterson17513.00
Toby Gerhart4205.00
Brett Favre1-1-1.00

Bears

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Jay Cutler22/3523732

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Matt Forte21693.30
Chester Taylor11333.00
Jay Cutler4246.00
Earl Bennett144.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +14.0%2.7%6.9%7.5%3.1%4.8%3.0%2.7%

Positive margins favour Bears; negative favour Vikings.

Half-point at risk

2.15%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

56.2%

Expected total

41.7est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+0.18
  • Home-field advantage+2.49
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+2.67