2010 · Week 10

Final

Titans

Tennessee

QB Kerry Collins

17·29

Dolphins

Miami

QB Chad Pennington

Sun Life Stadium · outdoors · grass · 79°F · wind 9mph

Closing spread

MIA -1

Total

43

Model margin

+2.0est.

MIA perspective

Push chance

2.2%est.

Win probability

  • Dolphins
  • Titans

How each play moved the game.

Dolphins winsTitans wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Titansedge mapDolphins
  • -0.017EPA / play-0.071
  • 40.0%Success rate41.7%
  • +0.083EPA / dropback-0.016
  • -0.153EPA / rush-0.155
  • 9.4%Explosive rate7.1%
  • -0.87CPOE-1.81
  • 34.8%Third-down rate40.4%
  • 61.2%Red-zone TD rate64.6%
  • 1.83Points / drive1.34
  • 2.9%Turnover rate2.6%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

All square 8–8 since 1999

TEN have won 3 straight. Meetings average 39.4 points. MIA are 8-8 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2024 · W4TEN @ MIA3112TEN
2023 · W14TEN @ MIA2827TEN
2021 · W17MIA @ TEN334TEN
2018 · W1TEN @ MIA2027MIA
2017 · W5TEN @ MIA1016MIA
2016 · W5TEN @ MIA3017TEN
2015 · W6MIA @ TEN3810MIA
2012 · W10TEN @ MIA373TEN

Box score

Individual performances

Titans

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Vince Young9/189211
Kerry Collins9/205100

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Chris Johnson171176.91
Vince Young2147.00
Javon Ringer640.70

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Bo Scaife79510
Randy Moss14260
Nate Washington39261
Justin Gage39180
Chris Johnson1370
Javon Ringer1140
Craig Stevens0100

Dolphins

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Chad Henne19/2824011
Tyler Thigpen4/66410
Chad Pennington1/21900
Brandon Marshall0/1000

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Ricky Williams11645.80
Ronnie Brown12110.91
Tyler Thigpen252.50
Chad Henne231.50
Patrick Cobbs111.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +14.1%2.7%7.1%7.5%3.1%4.7%3.0%

Positive margins favour Dolphins; negative favour Titans.

Half-point at risk

2.16%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

54.6%

Expected total

45.1est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+0.11
  • Home-field advantage+2.49
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential-0.56
  • Expected margin+2.04