2016 · Week 5

Final

Titans

Tennessee

QB Marcus Mariota

30·17

Dolphins

Miami

QB Ryan Tannehill

Hard Rock Stadium · outdoors · grass · 88°F · wind 15mph

Closing spread

MIA -2.5

Total

44.5

Model margin

+2.0est.

MIA perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Dolphins
  • Titans

How each play moved the game.

Dolphins winsTitans wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Titansedge mapDolphins
  • +0.037EPA / play-0.004
  • 45.5%Success rate42.2%
  • +0.103EPA / dropback+0.062
  • -0.049EPA / rush-0.092
  • 10.3%Explosive rate10.4%
  • +1.12CPOE+4.52
  • 45.6%Third-down rate37.0%
  • 75.2%Red-zone TD rate68.3%
  • 1.72Points / drive1.80
  • 1.7%Turnover rate2.2%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

All square 8–8 since 1999

TEN have won 3 straight. Meetings average 39.4 points. MIA are 8-8 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2024 · W4TEN @ MIA3112TEN
2023 · W14TEN @ MIA2827TEN
2021 · W17MIA @ TEN334TEN
2018 · W1TEN @ MIA2027MIA
2017 · W5TEN @ MIA1016MIA
2015 · W6MIA @ TEN3810MIA
2012 · W10TEN @ MIA373TEN
2010 · W10TEN @ MIA1729MIA

Box score

Individual performances

Titans

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Marcus Mariota20/2916330

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
DeMarco Murray271214.50
Marcus Mariota7608.61
Derrick Henry7547.70

Dolphins

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Ryan Tannehill12/1819102

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Jay Ajayi13423.21
Kenyan Drake242.00
Damien Williams133.00
Jarvis Landry122.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +2.54.1%2.7%7.1%7.5%3.1%4.7%3.0%

Positive margins favour Dolphins; negative favour Titans.

Half-point at risk

7.50%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

54.5%

Expected total

43.9est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+0.04
  • Home-field advantage+1.74
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential+0.24
  • Expected margin+2.02