2010 · Week 14

Final / OT

Ravens

Baltimore

QB Joe Flacco

34·28

Texans

Houston

QB Matt Schaub

Reliant Stadium · closed · grass

Closing spread

BAL -3

Total

47

Model margin

+1.9est.

HOU perspective

Push chance

7.1%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Texans
  • Ravens

How each play moved the game.

Texans winsRavens wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Ravensedge mapTexans
  • +0.028EPA / play+0.107
  • 41.8%Success rate47.5%
  • +0.133EPA / dropback+0.151
  • -0.102EPA / rush+0.039
  • 7.3%Explosive rate10.7%
  • +2.93CPOE+0.65
  • 38.4%Third-down rate41.2%
  • 57.9%Red-zone TD rate67.4%
  • 1.78Points / drive2.09
  • 1.7%Turnover rate1.7%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

BAL lead 13–3 since 1999

Meetings average 43.7 points. HOU are 6-10 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W5HOU @ BAL4410HOU
2024 · W17BAL @ HOU312BAL
2023 · playoffsHOU @ BAL1034BAL
2023 · W1HOU @ BAL925BAL
2020 · W2BAL @ HOU3316BAL
2019 · W11HOU @ BAL741BAL
2017 · W12HOU @ BAL1623BAL
2014 · W16BAL @ HOU1325HOU

Box score

Individual performances

Ravens

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Joe Flacco22/3323520

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Ray Rice19542.80
Willis McGahee471.81

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Derrick Mason610782
Ray Rice88660
Anquan Boldin38410
T.J. Houshmandzadeh23230
Ed Dickson1170
Donte' Stallworth0100

Texans

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Matt Schaub31/6239332

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Arian Foster201005.00
Matt Schaub188.00
Derrick Ward133.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Andre Johnson9141402
Owen Daniels511910
Kevin Walter510570
Jacoby Jones59521
David Anderson34280
Arian Foster47250
Joel Dreessen0300

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line -34.1%2.7%7.1%7.5%3.1%4.7%2.9%

Positive margins favour Texans; negative favour Ravens.

Half-point at risk

7.08%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

54.3%

Expected total

46.7est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-0.78
  • Home-field advantage+2.49
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential+0.24
  • Expected margin+1.94