2010 · Week 15 · Division

Final

Bears

Chicago

QB Jay Cutler

40·14

Vikings

Minnesota

QB Brett Favre

TCF Bank Stadium · outdoors · fieldturf · 23°F · wind 17mph

Closing spread

CHI -5.5

Total

34

Model margin

+2.2est.

MIN perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Vikings
  • Bears

How each play moved the game.

Vikings winsBears wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Bearsedge mapVikings
  • -0.097EPA / play-0.112
  • 39.0%Success rate42.3%
  • -0.053EPA / dropback-0.105
  • -0.166EPA / rush-0.121
  • 8.3%Explosive rate9.3%
  • +0.87CPOE-2.30
  • 33.1%Third-down rate34.1%
  • 47.3%Red-zone TD rate48.7%
  • 1.43Points / drive1.25
  • 3.2%Turnover rate3.5%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

MIN lead 28–26 since 1999

Meetings average 41.8 points. MIN are 23-30-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W11CHI @ MIN1917CHI
2025 · W1MIN @ CHI2724MIN
2024 · W15CHI @ MIN1230MIN
2024 · W12MIN @ CHI3027MIN
2023 · W12CHI @ MIN1210CHI
2023 · W6MIN @ CHI1913MIN
2022 · W18MIN @ CHI2913MIN
2022 · W5CHI @ MIN2229MIN

Box score

Individual performances

Bears

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Jay Cutler14/2419431

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Matt Forte17925.40
Garrett Wolfe482.00
Chester Taylor1150.50
Jay Cutler1-1-1.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Johnny Knox27781
Earl Bennett34370
Greg Olsen44280
Devin Hester23231
Devin Aromashodu11130
Rashied Davis1291
Matt Forte1160

Vikings

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Joe Webb15/2612902
Brett Favre5/76311

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Toby Gerhart16774.80
Joe Webb6386.31
Brett Favre100.00
Percy Harvin1-1-1.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line -5.54.0%2.7%7.0%7.5%3.1%4.7%3.0%

Positive margins favour Vikings; negative favour Bears.

Half-point at risk

1.73%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

55.0%

Expected total

41.7est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-0.18
  • Home-field advantage+2.49
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential-0.08
  • Expected margin+2.22