2010 · Week 17 · Division

Final

Cardinals

Arizona

QB John Skelton

7·38

49ers

San Francisco

QB Alex Smith

Candlestick Park · outdoors · grass · 49°F · wind 3mph

Closing spread

SF -6

Total

39.5

Model margin

+5.1est.

SF perspective

Push chance

3.2%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • 49ers
  • Cardinals

How each play moved the game.

49ers winsCardinals wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Cardinalsedge map49ers
  • -0.220EPA / play-0.055
  • 37.1%Success rate38.8%
  • -0.248EPA / dropback-0.024
  • -0.165EPA / rush-0.102
  • 8.3%Explosive rate8.8%
  • -9.59CPOE-4.51
  • 27.4%Third-down rate33.2%
  • 45.0%Red-zone TD rate55.8%
  • 1.06Points / drive1.30
  • 3.1%Turnover rate2.2%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

SF lead 28–22 since 1999

SF have won 2 straight. Meetings average 44.8 points. SF are 26-23-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W11SF @ ARI4122SF
2025 · W3ARI @ SF1516SF
2024 · W18SF @ ARI2447ARI
2024 · W5ARI @ SF2423ARI
2023 · W15SF @ ARI4529SF
2023 · W4ARI @ SF1635SF
2022 · W18ARI @ SF1338SF
2022 · W11SF @ ARI3810SF

Box score

Individual performances

Cardinals

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Richard Bartel16/2815001
John Skelton14/259211

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Tim Hightower12302.50
Jason Wright3237.70
Chris Wells5163.20
John Skelton294.50

49ers

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Alex Smith15/2927620

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Brian Westbrook13796.12
Anthony Dixon11222.00
Alex Smith1-1-1.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Vernon Davis36961
Josh Morgan34590
Michael Crabtree46470
Ted Ginn24411
Delanie Walker13170
Brian Westbrook14140
Anthony Dixon1120

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +63.5%6.4%7.4%3.2%4.9%3.3%3.0%

Positive margins favour 49ers; negative favour Cardinals.

Half-point at risk

3.19%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

62.6%

Expected total

41.3est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+2.75
  • Home-field advantage+2.49
  • Quarterback adjustment-0.05
  • Rest differential-0.08
  • Expected margin+5.10