2010 · DIV

Final

Seahawks

Seattle

QB Matt Hasselbeck

24·35

Bears

Chicago

QB Jay Cutler

Soldier Field · outdoors · grass · 24°F · wind 4mph

Closing spread

CHI -10

Total

42.5

Model margin

+5.1est.

CHI perspective

Push chance

3.3%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Bears
  • Seahawks

How each play moved the game.

Bears winsSeahawks wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Seahawksedge mapBears
  • -0.117EPA / play-0.097
  • 38.3%Success rate39.0%
  • -0.072EPA / dropback-0.053
  • -0.194EPA / rush-0.166
  • 7.9%Explosive rate8.3%
  • -1.80CPOE+0.87
  • 37.0%Third-down rate33.1%
  • 48.0%Red-zone TD rate47.3%
  • 1.36Points / drive1.43
  • 3.0%Turnover rate3.2%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

SEA lead 8–6 since 1999

Meetings average 41.3 points. CHI are 8-6 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2024 · W17SEA @ CHI63SEA
2021 · W16CHI @ SEA2524CHI
2018 · W2SEA @ CHI1724CHI
2015 · W3CHI @ SEA026SEA
2012 · W13SEA @ CHI2317SEA
2011 · W15SEA @ CHI3814SEA
2010 · W6SEA @ CHI2320SEA
2009 · W3CHI @ SEA2519CHI

Box score

Individual performances

Seahawks

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Matt Hasselbeck26/4625830

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Golden Tate11313.00
Leon Washington199.00
Justin Forsett492.30
Marshawn Lynch420.50
Matt Hasselbeck100.00

Bears

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Jay Cutler15/2827420
Matt Forte0/1001

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Matt Forte25803.20
Chester Taylor11444.01
Jay Cutler8435.42
Earl Bennett199.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Greg Olsen391131
Matt Forte33540
Johnny Knox47480
Kellen Davis22421
Earl Bennett14130
Devin Hester2440

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +106.4%7.5%3.2%4.9%3.3%3.0%

Positive margins favour Bears; negative favour Seahawks.

Half-point at risk

3.26%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

62.5%

Expected total

42.2est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+2.09
  • Home-field advantage+2.49
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential+0.48
  • Expected margin+5.06