Task Enterprises presentsNFL Intelligence

2011 · Week 15

Final

Seahawks

Seattle

QB Tarvaris Jackson

38·14

Bears

Chicago

QB Caleb Hanie

Soldier Field · outdoors · grass · 39°F · wind 5mph

Closing spread

CHI -3.5

Total

34.5

Model margin

-3.6est.

CHI perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Bears
  • Seahawks

How each play moved the game.

Bears winsSeahawks wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Seahawksedge mapBears
  • -0.069EPA / play-0.110
  • 38.9%Success rate39.3%
  • -0.035EPA / dropback-0.105
  • -0.118EPA / rush-0.117
  • 8.9%Explosive rate9.6%
  • +0.03CPOE-2.53
  • 33.6%Third-down rate32.9%
  • 48.7%Red-zone TD rate62.0%
  • 1.31Points / drive1.37
  • 2.2%Turnover rate2.9%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

SEA lead 8–6 since 1999

Meetings average 41.3 points. CHI are 8-6 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2024 · W17SEA @ CHI63SEA
2021 · W16CHI @ SEA2524CHI
2018 · W2SEA @ CHI1724CHI
2015 · W3CHI @ SEA026SEA
2012 · W13SEA @ CHI2317SEA
2010 · playoffsSEA @ CHI2435CHI
2010 · W6SEA @ CHI2320SEA
2009 · W3CHI @ SEA2519CHI

Box score

Individual performances

Seahawks

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Tarvaris Jackson19/3122710

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Marshawn Lynch20422.12
Justin Forsett6122.00
Leon Washington362.00
Golden Tate122.00
Tarvaris Jackson3-2-0.70

Bears

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Caleb Hanie10/2311113
Josh McCown1/21201

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Kahlil Bell15654.30
Caleb Hanie5346.80
Marion Barber11333.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Kahlil Bell56431
Dane Sanzenbacher26260
Earl Bennett11200
Johnny Knox13150
Kellen Davis13100
Roy Williams1490

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +3.53.1%4.8%3.2%7.5%6.8%3.8%

Positive margins favour Bears; negative favour Seahawks.

Half-point at risk

2.21%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

39.4%

Expected total

41.7est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-0.72
  • Home-field advantage+2.49
  • Quarterback adjustment-5.48
  • Rest differential+0.08
  • Expected margin-3.63