Task Enterprises presentsNFL Intelligence

2015 · Week 3

Final

Bears

Chicago

QB Jimmy Clausen

0·26

Seahawks

Seattle

QB Russell Wilson

CenturyLink Field · outdoors · fieldturf · 60°F · wind 5mph

Closing spread

SEA -16.5

Total

43.5

Model margin

+10.6est.

SEA perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Seahawks
  • Bears

How each play moved the game.

Seahawks winsBears wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Bearsedge mapSeahawks
  • -0.020EPA / play+0.105
  • 42.8%Success rate47.1%
  • +0.051EPA / dropback+0.255
  • -0.113EPA / rush-0.104
  • 8.8%Explosive rate10.9%
  • +1.51CPOE+7.64
  • 42.3%Third-down rate47.8%
  • 59.4%Red-zone TD rate63.8%
  • 1.74Points / drive2.18
  • 1.9%Turnover rate1.4%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

SEA lead 8–6 since 1999

Meetings average 41.3 points. SEA are 6-8 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2024 · W17SEA @ CHI63SEA
2021 · W16CHI @ SEA2524CHI
2018 · W2SEA @ CHI1724CHI
2012 · W13SEA @ CHI2317SEA
2011 · W15SEA @ CHI3814SEA
2010 · playoffsSEA @ CHI2435CHI
2010 · W6SEA @ CHI2320SEA
2009 · W3CHI @ SEA2519CHI

Box score

Individual performances

Bears

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Jimmy Clausen9/176300

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Matt Forte20743.70
Jimmy Clausen3134.30
Jacquizz Rodgers4112.80

Seahawks

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Russell Wilson20/3023510

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Thomas Rawls161046.50
Russell Wilson6284.70
Marshawn Lynch5142.80
Fred Jackson2136.50

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +16.56.5%2.3%3.0%4.8%3.5%3.6%3.0%2.7%

Positive margins favour Seahawks; negative favour Bears.

Half-point at risk

3.00%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

75.8%

Expected total

45.0est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+4.25
  • Home-field advantage+2.49
  • Quarterback adjustment+3.88
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+10.62