2009 · Week 3

Final

Bears

Chicago

QB Jay Cutler

25·19

Seahawks

Seattle

QB Seneca Wallace

Qwest Field · outdoors · fieldturf · 60°F · wind 7mph

Closing spread

CHI -1

Total

37.5

Model margin

+3.9est.

SEA perspective

Push chance

2.0%est.

Win probability

  • Seahawks
  • Bears

How each play moved the game.

Seahawks winsBears wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Bearsedge mapSeahawks
  • -0.089EPA / play-0.107
  • 39.6%Success rate40.9%
  • -0.064EPA / dropback-0.082
  • -0.135EPA / rush-0.150
  • 8.4%Explosive rate7.2%
  • +0.30CPOE-1.58
  • 37.3%Third-down rate34.0%
  • 52.0%Red-zone TD rate46.1%
  • 1.57Points / drive1.38
  • 3.2%Turnover rate2.8%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

SEA lead 8–6 since 1999

Meetings average 41.3 points. SEA are 6-8 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2024 · W17SEA @ CHI63SEA
2021 · W16CHI @ SEA2524CHI
2018 · W2SEA @ CHI1724CHI
2015 · W3CHI @ SEA026SEA
2012 · W13SEA @ CHI2317SEA
2011 · W15SEA @ CHI3814SEA
2010 · playoffsSEA @ CHI2435CHI
2010 · W6SEA @ CHI2320SEA

Box score

Individual performances

Bears

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Jay Cutler21/2724731

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Matt Forte21663.10
Adrian Peterson2126.00
Garrett Wolfe382.70
Jay Cutler2-1-0.50

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Earl Bennett44800
Devin Hester58761
Greg Olsen56441
Matt Forte66400
Johnny Knox1371

Seahawks

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Seneca Wallace26/4426111

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Julius Jones19985.20
Edgerrin James471.80
Justin Forsett242.00
Nate Burleson122.00
Seneca Wallace100.00
Deion Branch1-8-8.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line -13.7%6.7%7.5%3.2%4.9%3.2%2.8%

Positive margins favour Seahawks; negative favour Bears.

Half-point at risk

2.04%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

59.4%

Expected total

43.1est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-1.23
  • Home-field advantage+2.49
  • Quarterback adjustment+2.59
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+3.85