2010 · CON · Division

Final

Packers

Green Bay

QB Aaron Rodgers

21·14

Bears

Chicago

QB Jay Cutler

Soldier Field · outdoors · grass · 20°F · wind 14mph

Closing spread

GB -3.5

Total

42

Model margin

-0.0est.

CHI perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Bears
  • Packers

How each play moved the game.

Bears winsPackers wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Packersedge mapBears
  • +0.076EPA / play-0.097
  • 45.9%Success rate39.0%
  • +0.186EPA / dropback-0.053
  • -0.117EPA / rush-0.166
  • 8.2%Explosive rate8.3%
  • +5.31CPOE+0.87
  • 41.3%Third-down rate33.1%
  • 58.4%Red-zone TD rate47.3%
  • 1.91Points / drive1.43
  • 2.0%Turnover rate3.2%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

GB lead 40–16 since 1999

CHI have won 2 straight. Meetings average 42.8 points. CHI are 18-37-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · playoffsGB @ CHI2731CHI
2025 · W16GB @ CHI1622CHI
2025 · W14CHI @ GB2128GB
2024 · W18CHI @ GB2422CHI
2024 · W11GB @ CHI2019GB
2023 · W18CHI @ GB917GB
2023 · W1GB @ CHI3820GB
2022 · W13GB @ CHI2819GB

Box score

Individual performances

Packers

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Aaron Rodgers17/3024402

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
James Starks22743.41
Aaron Rodgers7395.61
Brandon Jackson252.50

Bears

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Caleb Hanie13/2015312
Jay Cutler6/148001
Todd Collins0/4000

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Matt Forte17704.10
Jay Cutler2105.00
Caleb Hanie133.00
Chester Taylor320.71
Earl Bennett1-2-2.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Matt Forte1015900
Johnny Knox26560
Earl Bennett35451
Greg Olsen35300
Chester Taylor11120
Devin Hester0400
Kellen Davis0100

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line -3.52.7%4.4%2.9%7.4%7.3%2.9%4.4%2.7%

Positive margins favour Bears; negative favour Packers.

Half-point at risk

7.36%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

49.0%

Expected total

42.2est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-2.44
  • Home-field advantage+2.49
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential-0.08
  • Expected margin-0.03