Closing spread
CHI -1
Total
41
Model margin
+0.1est.
CHI perspective
Push chance
2.2%est.
Availability
The injury report
The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.
Packers
- OutChristian WatsonWRHamstring· DNP
- QuestionableRomeo DoubsWRHamstring· Limited
- DNPDavid BakhtiariTNot injury related - resting player
- LimitedRashan GaryLBKnee
Bears
- QuestionableDylan ColeLBHamstring· Limited
- QuestionableRobert TonyanTEBack
Win probability
- Bears
- Packers
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- +0.075EPA / play-0.052
- 45.1%Success rate41.6%
- +0.155EPA / dropback-0.057
- -0.054EPA / rush-0.045
- 9.2%Explosive rate9.6%
- +1.07CPOE+0.01
- 47.4%Third-down rate41.7%
- 56.0%Red-zone TD rate62.5%
- 2.16Points / drive1.72
- 1.5%Turnover rate2.2%
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
GB lead 41–16 since 1999
Meetings average 42.7 points. CHI are 18-38-1 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | GB–CHI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHI | Q1 15:00 | 6 | 28 | Turnover on downs | 0–0 |
| GB | Q1 11:31 | 11 | 40 | Touchdown | 7–0 |
| CHI | Q1 6:08 | 6 | 48 | Field goal | 7–3 |
| GB | Q1 2:04 | 3 | 4 | Punt | 7–3 |
| CHI | Q1 0:32 | 11 | 47 | Field goal | 7–6 |
| GB | Q2 9:00 | 3 | 8 | Punt | 7–6 |
| CHI | Q2 7:16 | 4 | 10 | Punt | 7–6 |
| GB | Q2 5:28 | 6 | 26 | Punt | 7–6 |
| CHI | Q2 2:12 | 5 | 14 | Punt | 7–6 |
| GB | Q2 1:12 | 5 | 22 | Field goal | 10–6 |
| GB | Q3 15:00 | 8 | 75 | Touchdown | 17–6 |
| CHI | Q3 10:19 | 3 | -2 | Punt | 17–6 |
| GB | Q3 8:05 | 4 | 42 | Touchdown | 24–6 |
| CHI | Q3 6:26 | 3 | 7 | Turnover | 24–6 |
| GB | Q3 4:58 | 3 | 2 | Punt | 24–6 |
| CHI | Q3 3:22 | 7 | 55 | Touchdown | 24–14 |
| GB | Q3 0:59 | 5 | 66 | Touchdown | 31–14 |
| CHI | Q4 13:30 | 3 | -1 | Opp touchdown | 38–14 |
| CHI | Q4 12:36 | 5 | 9 | Punt | 38–14 |
| GB | Q4 10:12 | 7 | 24 | Punt | 38–14 |
| CHI | Q4 6:18 | 14 | 69 | Touchdown | 38–20 |
| GB | Q4 2:54 | 5 | 20 | Turnover on downs | 38–20 |
| CHI | Q4 1:03 | 5 | 27 | End of half | 38–20 |
Box score
Individual performances
Packers
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jordan Love | 15/27 | 245 | 3 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aaron Jones | 9 | 41 | 4.6 | 1 |
| Patrick Taylor | 5 | 22 | 4.4 | 0 |
| AJ Dillon | 13 | 19 | 1.5 | 0 |
| Jordan Love | 3 | 12 | 4.0 | 0 |
| Sean Clifford | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 |
| Jayden Reed | 1 | -2 | -2.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aaron Jones | 2 | 4 | 86 | 1 |
| Luke Musgrave | 3 | 4 | 50 | 0 |
| Jayden Reed | 2 | 5 | 48 | 0 |
| Romeo Doubs | 4 | 5 | 26 | 2 |
| Samori Toure | 2 | 3 | 18 | 0 |
| AJ Dillon | 2 | 3 | 17 | 0 |
| Dontayvion Wicks | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Malik Heath | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Bears
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Justin Fields | 24/37 | 216 | 1 | 1 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Justin Fields | 9 | 59 | 6.6 | 0 |
| Khalil Herbert | 9 | 27 | 3.0 | 0 |
| Roschon Johnson | 5 | 20 | 4.0 | 1 |
| D'Onta Foreman | 5 | 16 | 3.2 | 0 |
| Cole Kmet | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Darnell Mooney | 4 | 7 | 53 | 1 |
| Cole Kmet | 5 | 7 | 44 | 0 |
| Khalil Herbert | 3 | 5 | 37 | 0 |
| Roschon Johnson | 6 | 7 | 35 | 0 |
| DJ Moore | 2 | 2 | 25 | 0 |
| Tyler Scott | 2 | 2 | 14 | 0 |
| D'Onta Foreman | 2 | 3 | 8 | 0 |
| Chase Claypool | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Bears; negative favour Packers.
Half-point at risk
2.16%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
49.5%
Expected total
45.0est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-1.55
- Home-field advantage+1.71
- Quarterback adjustment0.00
- Rest differential0.00
- Expected margin+0.15



