2012 · Week 4 · Division

Final

Vikings

Minnesota

QB Christian Ponder

20·13

Lions

Detroit

QB Matthew Stafford

Ford Field · dome · fieldturf

Closing spread

DET -3.5

Total

48

Model margin

+1.7est.

DET perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Lions
  • Vikings

How each play moved the game.

Lions winsVikings wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Vikingsedge mapLions
  • +0.011EPA / play-0.004
  • 42.1%Success rate45.2%
  • +0.030EPA / dropback+0.056
  • -0.013EPA / rush-0.131
  • 9.7%Explosive rate8.6%
  • -2.66CPOE-2.29
  • 37.4%Third-down rate41.4%
  • 59.6%Red-zone TD rate61.9%
  • 1.91Points / drive1.65
  • 2.2%Turnover rate2.5%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

MIN lead 36–18 since 1999

MIN have won 2 straight. Meetings average 44.5 points. DET are 25-25-4 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W17DET @ MIN1023MIN
2025 · W9MIN @ DET2724MIN
2024 · W18MIN @ DET931DET
2024 · W7DET @ MIN3129DET
2023 · W18MIN @ DET2030DET
2023 · W16DET @ MIN3024DET
2022 · W14MIN @ DET2334DET
2022 · W3DET @ MIN2428MIN

Box score

Individual performances

Vikings

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Christian Ponder16/2611100

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Adrian Peterson211024.90
Percy Harvin3124.00
Toby Gerhart382.70
Christian Ponder155.00

Lions

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Matthew Stafford30/5131900

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Mikel Leshoure13262.00
Matthew Stafford4143.51
Nate Burleson188.00
Titus Young155.00
Joique Bell122.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +3.54.1%2.8%7.1%7.5%3.1%4.6%2.9%

Positive margins favour Lions; negative favour Vikings.

Half-point at risk

2.52%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

53.5%

Expected total

43.6est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-0.82
  • Home-field advantage+2.49
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+1.66