Closing spread
CHI -6
Total
41
Model margin
+4.4est.
CHI perspective
Push chance
3.2%est.
the line sits on a key number
Availability
The injury report
The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.
Vikings
- ProbableKevin WilliamsDTKnee· DNP
- ProbableJohn SullivanCKnee· Limited
- ProbableErin HendersonLBHeel· Full
- ProbableJosh RobinsonCBQuadricep· Full
- ProbableLarry DeanLBShoulder· Full
- ProbableMistral RaymondSShoulder· Full
- ProbablePhil LoadholtTKnee· Full
Bears
- ProbableJulius PeppersDEIllness· Limited
- ProbableCharles TillmanCBKnee· Full
Win probability
- Bears
- Vikings
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- -0.017EPA / play+0.077
- 41.4%Success rate45.2%
- -0.026EPA / dropback+0.164
- -0.002EPA / rush-0.072
- 10.2%Explosive rate9.9%
- -2.09CPOE+4.85
- 36.4%Third-down rate42.7%
- 57.9%Red-zone TD rate64.4%
- 1.75Points / drive1.95
- 2.8%Turnover rate2.1%
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
MIN lead 29–26 since 1999
Meetings average 41.3 points. CHI are 30-24-1 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | MIN–CHI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIN | Q1 15:00 | 0 | 0 | Touchdown | 7–0 |
| CHI | Q1 14:47 | 5 | 32 | Touchdown | 7–7 |
| MIN | Q1 12:12 | 6 | 19 | Punt | 7–7 |
| CHI | Q1 10:09 | 8 | 25 | Punt | 7–7 |
| MIN | Q1 5:13 | 6 | 10 | Punt | 7–7 |
| CHI | Q1 2:10 | 3 | 86 | Touchdown | 7–14 |
| MIN | Q1 1:04 | 6 | 34 | Punt | 7–14 |
| CHI | Q2 13:23 | 10 | 41 | Opp touchdown | 14–14 |
| CHI | Q2 7:34 | 5 | 22 | Turnover | 14–14 |
| MIN | Q2 4:28 | 4 | 11 | Opp touchdown | 14–21 |
| MIN | Q2 2:51 | 6 | 75 | Touchdown | 21–21 |
| CHI | Q2 1:11 | 8 | 63 | Field goal | 21–24 |
| CHI | Q3 15:00 | 4 | 20 | Punt | 21–24 |
| MIN | Q3 12:30 | 5 | 13 | Turnover | 21–24 |
| CHI | Q3 10:15 | 3 | 1 | Punt | 21–24 |
| MIN | Q3 8:17 | 12 | 81 | Field goal | 24–24 |
| CHI | Q3 2:32 | 6 | 33 | Turnover | 24–24 |
| MIN | Q4 14:54 | 12 | 64 | Field goal | 27–24 |
| CHI | Q4 8:05 | 3 | 13 | Turnover | 27–24 |
| MIN | Q4 6:28 | 7 | 43 | Field goal | 30–24 |
| CHI | Q4 3:15 | 10 | 76 | Touchdown | 30–31 |
| MIN | Q4 0:10 | 0 | 0 | Turnover | 30–31 |
| CHI | Q4 0:03 | 0 | 0 | Turnover | 30–31 |
Box score
Individual performances
Vikings
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christian Ponder | 16/30 | 227 | 1 | 1 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adrian Peterson | 26 | 100 | 3.8 | 0 |
| Christian Ponder | 6 | 18 | 3.0 | 0 |
| Toby Gerhart | 1 | 5 | 5.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greg Jennings | 5 | 6 | 84 | 0 |
| Jerome Simpson | 2 | 5 | 49 | 0 |
| Kyle Rudolph | 3 | 6 | 42 | 1 |
| Jarius Wright | 1 | 2 | 21 | 0 |
| Cordarrelle Patterson | 2 | 2 | 14 | 0 |
| Adrian Peterson | 1 | 2 | 7 | 0 |
| John Carlson | 1 | 2 | 7 | 0 |
| Toby Gerhart | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 |
Bears
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jay Cutler | 27/38 | 292 | 3 | 2 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matt Forte | 20 | 88 | 4.4 | 0 |
| Alshon Jeffery | 2 | 30 | 15.0 | 0 |
| Jay Cutler | 3 | 9 | 3.0 | 0 |
| Michael Bush | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brandon Marshall | 7 | 10 | 113 | 1 |
| Martellus Bennett | 7 | 9 | 76 | 2 |
| Matt Forte | 10 | 10 | 73 | 0 |
| Earl Bennett | 2 | 2 | 19 | 0 |
| Alshon Jeffery | 1 | 5 | 11 | 0 |
| Steve Maneri | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Bears; negative favour Vikings.
Half-point at risk
3.18%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
60.7%
Expected total
46.1est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+0.92
- Home-field advantage+2.49
- Quarterback adjustment+0.96
- Rest differential0.00
- Expected margin+4.38



