2013 · Week 2 · Division

Final

Vikings

Minnesota

QB Christian Ponder

30·31

Bears

Chicago

QB Jay Cutler

Soldier Field · outdoors · grass · 60°F · wind 6mph

Closing spread

CHI -6

Total

41

Model margin

+4.4est.

CHI perspective

Push chance

3.2%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Bears
  • Vikings

How each play moved the game.

Bears winsVikings wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Vikingsedge mapBears
  • -0.017EPA / play+0.077
  • 41.4%Success rate45.2%
  • -0.026EPA / dropback+0.164
  • -0.002EPA / rush-0.072
  • 10.2%Explosive rate9.9%
  • -2.09CPOE+4.85
  • 36.4%Third-down rate42.7%
  • 57.9%Red-zone TD rate64.4%
  • 1.75Points / drive1.95
  • 2.8%Turnover rate2.1%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

MIN lead 28–26 since 1999

Meetings average 41.8 points. CHI are 30-23-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W11CHI @ MIN1917CHI
2025 · W1MIN @ CHI2724MIN
2024 · W15CHI @ MIN1230MIN
2024 · W12MIN @ CHI3027MIN
2023 · W12CHI @ MIN1210CHI
2023 · W6MIN @ CHI1913MIN
2022 · W18MIN @ CHI2913MIN
2022 · W5CHI @ MIN2229MIN

Box score

Individual performances

Vikings

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Christian Ponder16/3022711

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Adrian Peterson261003.80
Christian Ponder6183.00
Toby Gerhart155.00

Bears

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Jay Cutler27/3829232

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Matt Forte20884.40
Alshon Jeffery23015.00
Jay Cutler393.00
Michael Bush200.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Brandon Marshall7101131
Martellus Bennett79762
Matt Forte1010730
Earl Bennett22190
Alshon Jeffery15110
Steve Maneri0100

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +63.6%6.6%7.5%3.2%4.9%3.2%2.9%

Positive margins favour Bears; negative favour Vikings.

Half-point at risk

3.18%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

60.7%

Expected total

46.1est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+0.92
  • Home-field advantage+2.49
  • Quarterback adjustment+0.96
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+4.38