2013 · Week 3

Final

Chargers

San Diego

QB Philip Rivers

17·20

Titans

Tennessee

QB Jake Locker

LP Field · outdoors · grass · 72°F · wind 7mph

Closing spread

TEN -3

Total

43

Model margin

+1.6est.

TEN perspective

Push chance

7.5%est.

the line sits on a key number

Availability

The injury report

The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.

Chargers

Titans

Win probability

  • Titans
  • Chargers

How each play moved the game.

Titans winsChargers wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

The rivalry

SD lead 12–3 since 1999

CHARGERS have won 2 straight. Meetings average 46.7 points. TEN are 3-9-3 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W9LAC @ TEN27–20CHARGERS
2024 · W10TEN @ LAC17–27CHARGERS
2023 · W2LAC @ TEN24–27TEN
2022 · W15TEN @ LAC14–17CHARGERS
2019 · W7LAC @ TEN20–23TEN
2018 · W7TEN @ LAC19–20CHARGERS
2016 · W9TEN @ SD35–43CHARGERS
2012 · W2TEN @ SD10–38CHARGERS

Possession by possession

How it unfolded

Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.

Drive-by-drive log
BallStartPlaysYardsResultSD–TEN
TENQ1 15:0036Punt0–0
LACQ1 13:06649Touchdown7–0
TENQ1 9:3435Punt7–0
LACQ1 7:15729Punt7–0
TENQ1 2:501090Field goal7–3
LACQ2 13:00418Punt7–3
TENQ2 11:03947Turnover on downs7–3
LACQ2 7:43612Field goal10–3
TENQ2 4:47886Touchdown10–10
LACQ2 1:08730Missed field goal10–10
LACQ3 15:00733Punt10–10
TENQ3 10:55751Missed field goal10–10
LACQ3 7:07967Touchdown17–10
TENQ3 2:42931Punt17–10
LACQ4 12:0832Punt17–10
TENQ4 10:311142Field goal17–13
LACQ4 6:07728Punt17–13
TENQ4 2:05994Touchdown17–20
LACQ4 0:1539Turnover17–20

Box score

Individual performances

Titans

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Jake Locker23/3729910

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Chris Johnson19904.70
Jake Locker56813.61
Jackie Battle4123.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +34.1%2.8%7.1%7.5%3.0%4.6%2.9%

Positive margins favour Titans; negative favour Chargers.

Half-point at risk

7.48%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

53.4%

Expected total

44.5est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-0.27
  • Home-field advantage+2.49
  • Quarterback adjustment-0.62
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+1.59

One or both ratings are carry-over priors — no games have been played this season yet, so treat this as a starting assumption rather than a read.