2013 · Week 13 · Division

Final / OT

Bears

Chicago

QB Josh McCown

20·23

Vikings

Minnesota

QB Christian Ponder

Mall of America Field · dome · sportturf

Closing spread

MIN -2.5

Total

48.5

Model margin

-4.6est.

MIN perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Vikings
  • Bears

How each play moved the game.

Vikings winsBears wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Bearsedge mapVikings
  • +0.077EPA / play-0.017
  • 45.2%Success rate41.4%
  • +0.164EPA / dropback-0.026
  • -0.072EPA / rush-0.002
  • 9.9%Explosive rate10.2%
  • +4.85CPOE-2.09
  • 42.7%Third-down rate36.4%
  • 64.4%Red-zone TD rate57.9%
  • 1.95Points / drive1.75
  • 2.1%Turnover rate2.8%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

MIN lead 28–26 since 1999

Meetings average 41.8 points. MIN are 23-30-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W11CHI @ MIN1917CHI
2025 · W1MIN @ CHI2724MIN
2024 · W15CHI @ MIN1230MIN
2024 · W12MIN @ CHI3027MIN
2023 · W12CHI @ MIN1210CHI
2023 · W6MIN @ CHI1913MIN
2022 · W18MIN @ CHI2913MIN
2022 · W5CHI @ MIN2229MIN

Box score

Individual performances

Bears

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Josh McCown23/3635520

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Matt Forte231205.20
Michael Bush11515.00
Alshon Jeffery100.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Alshon Jeffery12152492
Brandon Marshall49450
Matt Forte22310
Earl Bennett23170
Martellus Bennett25140

Vikings

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Matt Cassel20/3324311
Christian Ponder3/84000

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Adrian Peterson352116.00
Cordarrelle Patterson22713.51
Toby Gerhart284.00
Matt Cassel100.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +2.53.2%4.9%3.2%7.5%6.5%3.6%

Positive margins favour Vikings; negative favour Bears.

Half-point at risk

6.52%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

36.8%

Expected total

46.1est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-0.92
  • Home-field advantage+2.49
  • Quarterback adjustment-6.19
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin-4.63