Closing spread
SF -7
Total
47
Model margin
+4.4est.
SF perspective
Push chance
4.9%est.
the line sits on a key number
Availability
The injury report
The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.
Bears
- OutDavid FalesQBright Shoulder· DNP
- OutMatt SlausonGAnkle· DNP
- OutRoberto GarzaCAnkle· DNP
- OutTony FiammettaRBHamstring· DNP
- DoubtfulJosh MorganWRGroin· DNP
- QuestionableAlshon JefferyWRHamstring· Limited
- QuestionableBrandon MarshallWRAnkle· DNP
- LimitedCharles TillmanCBNot Injury Related
49ers
- OutMarcus MartinCKnee· DNP
- QuestionableAnthony DavisTHamstring· DNP
- QuestionableChris CulliverCBConcussion· Limited
- QuestionableTramaine BrockCBToe· DNP
- ProbableAndy LeePright Knee· Full
- ProbableJustin SmithDTNot Injury Related· Full
Win probability
- 49ers
- Bears
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- -0.055EPA / play-0.029
- 44.2%Success rate42.6%
- -0.032EPA / dropback+0.061
- -0.104EPA / rush-0.167
- 7.1%Explosive rate9.9%
- -0.14CPOE-2.41
- 38.4%Third-down rate40.5%
- 67.3%Red-zone TD rate54.0%
- 1.62Points / drive1.44
- 2.8%Turnover rate2.0%
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
SF lead 9–8 since 1999
SF have won 2 straight. Meetings average 41.3 points. SF are 10-7 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | CHI–SF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHI | Q1 15:00 | 3 | 1 | Punt | 0–0 |
| SF | Q1 13:16 | 3 | 8 | Touchdown | 0–7 |
| CHI | Q1 12:42 | 5 | 16 | Punt | 0–7 |
| SF | Q1 10:32 | 15 | 77 | Field goal | 0–10 |
| CHI | Q1 2:48 | 9 | 19 | Punt | 0–10 |
| SF | Q2 13:55 | 3 | 9 | Punt | 0–10 |
| CHI | Q2 11:26 | 3 | -5 | Punt | 0–10 |
| SF | Q2 9:30 | 1 | 0 | Turnover | 0–10 |
| CHI | Q2 9:21 | 3 | 1 | Punt | 0–10 |
| SF | Q2 7:39 | 5 | 67 | Turnover | 0–10 |
| CHI | Q2 5:12 | 3 | 1 | Punt | 0–10 |
| SF | Q2 3:25 | 4 | 30 | Touchdown | 0–17 |
| CHI | Q2 2:22 | 11 | 60 | Touchdown | 7–17 |
| SF | Q2 0:13 | 2 | 4 | End of half | 7–17 |
| SF | Q3 15:00 | 13 | 79 | Field goal | 7–20 |
| CHI | Q3 5:56 | 15 | 80 | Touchdown | 14–20 |
| SF | Q4 13:35 | 1 | 0 | Turnover | 20–20 |
| CHI | Q4 13:17 | 1 | 3 | Touchdown | 21–20 |
| SF | Q4 13:14 | 6 | 17 | Turnover | 21–20 |
| CHI | Q4 9:08 | 4 | 42 | Touchdown | 28–20 |
| SF | Q4 6:55 | 14 | 68 | Turnover on downs | 28–20 |
| CHI | Q4 1:11 | 0 | 0 | End of half | 28–20 |
Box score
Individual performances
Bears
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jay Cutler | 23/34 | 176 | 4 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jay Cutler | 5 | 25 | 5.0 | 0 |
| Matt Forte | 12 | 21 | 1.8 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brandon Marshall | 5 | 8 | 48 | 3 |
| Alshon Jeffery | 3 | 6 | 47 | 0 |
| Martellus Bennett | 7 | 8 | 37 | 1 |
| Santonio Holmes | 2 | 2 | 20 | 0 |
| Matt Forte | 5 | 8 | 15 | 0 |
| Dante Rosario | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 |
| Josh Bellamy | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
49ers
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colin Kaepernick | 21/34 | 248 | 1 | 3 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colin Kaepernick | 9 | 64 | 7.1 | 0 |
| Frank Gore | 13 | 63 | 4.8 | 1 |
| Carlos Hyde | 4 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Crabtree | 7 | 9 | 82 | 1 |
| Derek Carrier | 3 | 4 | 41 | 0 |
| Vernon Davis | 3 | 3 | 39 | 0 |
| Anquan Boldin | 2 | 6 | 34 | 0 |
| Steve Johnson | 2 | 4 | 26 | 0 |
| Frank Gore | 2 | 2 | 12 | 0 |
| Vance McDonald | 1 | 2 | 9 | 0 |
| Carlos Hyde | 1 | 2 | 5 | 0 |
| Bruce Ellington | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour 49ers; negative favour Bears.
Half-point at risk
4.90%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
60.9%
Expected total
45.0est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+1.95
- Home-field advantage+2.49
- Quarterback adjustment0.00
- Rest differential0.00
- Expected margin+4.44



