Closing spread
SF -6.5
Total
38
Model margin
-0.9est.
CHI perspective
Push chance
None
half-point line — cannot push
Availability
The injury report
The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.
49ers
- OutDaniel BrunskillGHamstring· DNP
- QuestionableGeorge KittleTEGroin· DNP
- LimitedDre GreenlawLBElbow
Bears
- DoubtfulVelus JonesWRHamstring· DNP
- QuestionableDominique RobinsonDEKnee· Limited
Win probability
- Bears
- 49ers
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- +0.084EPA / play-0.039
- 46.1%Success rate41.1%
- +0.171EPA / dropback-0.070
- -0.021EPA / rush-0.004
- 10.7%Explosive rate10.4%
- -1.99CPOE-4.05
- 45.1%Third-down rate41.0%
- 60.5%Red-zone TD rate60.7%
- 2.20Points / drive1.78
- 1.6%Turnover rate2.3%
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
SF lead 9–8 since 1999
SF have won 2 straight. Meetings average 41.3 points. CHI are 7-10 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | SF–CHI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHI | Q1 15:00 | 3 | -7 | Punt | 0–0 |
| SF | Q1 13:30 | 5 | 50 | Turnover | 0–0 |
| CHI | Q1 10:19 | 6 | 23 | Turnover | 0–0 |
| SF | Q1 7:27 | 4 | 13 | Punt | 0–0 |
| CHI | Q1 4:58 | 5 | 3 | Punt | 0–0 |
| SF | Q1 2:05 | 3 | 7 | Punt | 0–0 |
| CHI | Q1 0:34 | 3 | 4 | Punt | 0–0 |
| SF | Q2 13:43 | 7 | 48 | Touchdown | 7–0 |
| CHI | Q2 10:11 | 3 | 3 | Punt | 7–0 |
| SF | Q2 8:43 | 7 | 27 | Punt | 7–0 |
| CHI | Q2 4:42 | 11 | 42 | Punt | 7–0 |
| SF | Q2 0:25 | 4 | 34 | End of half | 7–0 |
| SF | Q3 15:00 | 10 | 68 | Field goal | 10–0 |
| CHI | Q3 8:22 | 6 | 57 | Touchdown | 10–7 |
| SF | Q3 5:32 | 6 | 21 | Punt | 10–7 |
| CHI | Q3 1:37 | 10 | 64 | Touchdown | 10–13 |
| SF | Q4 12:45 | 7 | 21 | Turnover | 10–13 |
| CHI | Q4 9:42 | 5 | 17 | Touchdown | 10–19 |
| SF | Q4 7:21 | 12 | 41 | Turnover on downs | 10–19 |
| CHI | Q4 3:38 | 3 | 0 | Punt | 10–19 |
| SF | Q4 2:29 | 4 | 1 | Turnover on downs | 10–19 |
| CHI | Q4 1:29 | 0 | 0 | End of half | 10–19 |
Box score
Individual performances
49ers
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trey Lance | 13/28 | 164 | 0 | 1 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trey Lance | 13 | 54 | 4.2 | 0 |
| Deebo Samuel Sr. | 8 | 52 | 6.5 | 1 |
| Elijah Mitchell | 6 | 41 | 6.8 | 0 |
| Jeff Wilson | 9 | 22 | 2.4 | 0 |
| Brandon Aiyuk | 1 | 7 | 7.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jauan Jennings | 4 | 6 | 62 | 0 |
| Brandon Aiyuk | 2 | 3 | 40 | 0 |
| Ray-Ray McCloud | 1 | 2 | 20 | 0 |
| Deebo Samuel Sr. | 2 | 7 | 14 | 0 |
| Ross Dwelley | 1 | 2 | 11 | 0 |
| Tyler Kroft | 1 | 2 | 9 | 0 |
| Jeff Wilson | 2 | 2 | 8 | 0 |
Bears
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Justin Fields | 8/17 | 121 | 2 | 1 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Khalil Herbert | 9 | 45 | 5.0 | 1 |
| Justin Fields | 11 | 28 | 2.5 | 0 |
| David Montgomery | 17 | 26 | 1.5 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dante Pettis | 1 | 1 | 51 | 1 |
| David Montgomery | 3 | 4 | 24 | 0 |
| Byron Pringle | 1 | 2 | 22 | 0 |
| Equanimeous St. Brown | 1 | 3 | 18 | 1 |
| Darnell Mooney | 1 | 3 | 8 | 0 |
| Ryan Griffin | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Cole Kmet | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Khalil Herbert | 1 | 1 | -2 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Bears; negative favour 49ers.
Half-point at risk
3.00%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
46.7%
Expected total
45.1est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-7.12
- Home-field advantage+1.71
- Quarterback adjustment+4.52
- Rest differential0.00
- Expected margin-0.90



