2015 · Week 3 · Division

Final

49ers

San Francisco

QB Colin Kaepernick

7·47

Cardinals

Arizona

QB Carson Palmer

University of Phoenix Stadium · closed · grass

Closing spread

ARI -7

Total

45

Model margin

+5.9est.

ARI perspective

Push chance

5.0%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Cardinals
  • 49ers

How each play moved the game.

Cardinals wins49ers wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

49ersedge mapCardinals
  • -0.091EPA / play+0.133
  • 38.8%Success rate47.7%
  • -0.060EPA / dropback+0.260
  • -0.150EPA / rush-0.059
  • 8.0%Explosive rate10.8%
  • -3.50CPOE+4.51
  • 30.2%Third-down rate47.4%
  • 54.2%Red-zone TD rate61.1%
  • 1.32Points / drive2.34
  • 1.5%Turnover rate2.1%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

SF lead 28–22 since 1999

SF have won 2 straight. Meetings average 44.8 points. ARI are 23-26-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W11SF @ ARI4122SF
2025 · W3ARI @ SF1516SF
2024 · W18SF @ ARI2447ARI
2024 · W5ARI @ SF2423ARI
2023 · W15SF @ ARI4529SF
2023 · W4ARI @ SF1635SF
2022 · W18ARI @ SF1338SF
2022 · W11SF @ ARI3810SF

Box score

Individual performances

49ers

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Colin Kaepernick9/196704

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Carlos Hyde15513.40
Colin Kaepernick7466.61
Mike Davis760.90

Cardinals

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Carson Palmer20/3231121

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Chris Johnson221105.02
David Johnson7253.60
Stepfan Taylor461.50
Carson Palmer111.00
Drew Stanton3-3-1.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Larry Fitzgerald9111342
John Brown35620
Chris Johnson12400
Jermaine Gresham23340
David Johnson33160
Darren Fells12130
Michael Floyd15120

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +73.3%6.2%7.4%3.2%5.0%3.3%3.1%

Positive margins favour Cardinals; negative favour 49ers.

Half-point at risk

4.97%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

64.6%

Expected total

44.0est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+3.89
  • Home-field advantage+2.49
  • Quarterback adjustment-0.49
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+5.88