Task Enterprises presentsNFL Intelligence

2015 · Week 15 · Division

Final

Bears

Chicago

QB Jay Cutler

17·38

Vikings

Minnesota

QB Teddy Bridgewater

TCF Bank Stadium · outdoors · fieldturf · 36°F · wind 3mph

Closing spread

MIN -4

Total

43.5

Model margin

+4.8est.

MIN perspective

Push chance

2.5%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Vikings
  • Bears

How each play moved the game.

Vikings winsBears wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Bearsedge mapVikings
  • -0.020EPA / play+0.022
  • 42.8%Success rate40.7%
  • +0.051EPA / dropback+0.050
  • -0.113EPA / rush-0.013
  • 8.8%Explosive rate9.6%
  • +1.51CPOE+2.87
  • 42.3%Third-down rate39.2%
  • 59.4%Red-zone TD rate57.3%
  • 1.74Points / drive1.94
  • 1.9%Turnover rate1.6%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

MIN lead 28–26 since 1999

Meetings average 41.8 points. MIN are 23-30-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W11CHI @ MIN1917CHI
2025 · W1MIN @ CHI2724MIN
2024 · W15CHI @ MIN1230MIN
2024 · W12MIN @ CHI3027MIN
2023 · W12CHI @ MIN1210CHI
2023 · W6MIN @ CHI1913MIN
2022 · W18MIN @ CHI2913MIN
2022 · W5CHI @ MIN2229MIN

Box score

Individual performances

Bears

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Jay Cutler26/3723121

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Matt Forte8475.90
Jeremy Langford11464.20
Jay Cutler111.00

Vikings

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Teddy Bridgewater17/2023140

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Adrian Peterson18633.50
Matt Asiata5285.60
Teddy Bridgewater4174.31
Jerick McKinnon7101.40
Adam Thielen188.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Jerick McKinnon44761
Stefon Diggs34552
Mike Wallace33370
Jarius Wright33320
Kyle Rudolph22210
Matt Asiata1260

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +43.5%6.5%7.5%3.2%4.9%3.2%3.0%

Positive margins favour Vikings; negative favour Bears.

Half-point at risk

2.55%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

61.9%

Expected total

44.9est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+2.09
  • Home-field advantage+2.49
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential+0.24
  • Expected margin+4.81