2016 · Week 2 · Division

Final

Seahawks

Seattle

QB Russell Wilson

3·9

Rams

Los Angeles

QB Case Keenum

Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum · outdoors · grass · 88°F · wind 3mph

Closing spread

SEA -5.5

Total

38

Model margin

-3.8est.

LA perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Rams
  • Seahawks

How each play moved the game.

Rams winsSeahawks wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Seahawksedge mapRams
  • +0.022EPA / play-0.203
  • 44.0%Success rate36.6%
  • +0.102EPA / dropback-0.222
  • -0.126EPA / rush-0.170
  • 8.7%Explosive rate6.8%
  • +4.81CPOE-6.92
  • 38.7%Third-down rate32.2%
  • 41.8%Red-zone TD rate47.6%
  • 1.88Points / drive0.97
  • 1.7%Turnover rate2.8%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

SEA lead 28–24 since 1999

SEA have won 2 straight. Meetings average 43.7 points. LA are 28-24 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · playoffsLA @ SEA2731SEA
2025 · W16LA @ SEA3738SEA
2025 · W11SEA @ LA1921RAMS
2024 · W18SEA @ LA3025SEA
2024 · W9LA @ SEA2620RAMS
2023 · W11SEA @ LA1617RAMS
2023 · W1LA @ SEA3013RAMS
2022 · W18LA @ SEA1619SEA

Box score

Individual performances

Seahawks

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Russell Wilson22/3525400

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Christine Michael10606.00
Russell Wilson5142.80
Alex Collins200.00
Thomas Rawls7-7-1.00

Rams

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Case Keenum18/3023900

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Todd Gurley19512.70
Tavon Austin263.00
Case Keenum351.70
Benny Cunningham122.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Kenny Britt610940
Lance Kendricks46610
Tavon Austin59500
Todd Gurley11190
Brian Quick1180
Benny Cunningham1270

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line -5.52.8%3.1%4.9%3.2%7.5%6.7%3.7%

Positive margins favour Rams; negative favour Seahawks.

Half-point at risk

1.97%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

38.9%

Expected total

42.2est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-5.50
  • Home-field advantage+1.74
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential-0.08
  • Expected margin-3.84