Task Enterprises presentsNFL Intelligence

2016 · Week 4 · Division

Final

Rams

Los Angeles

QB Case Keenum

17·13

Cardinals

Arizona

QB Carson Palmer

University of Phoenix Stadium · closed · grass

Closing spread

ARI -10

Total

43.5

Model margin

+7.5est.

ARI perspective

Push chance

3.4%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Cardinals
  • Rams

How each play moved the game.

Cardinals winsRams wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Ramsedge mapCardinals
  • -0.203EPA / play-0.005
  • 36.6%Success rate45.3%
  • -0.222EPA / dropback+0.043
  • -0.170EPA / rush-0.093
  • 6.8%Explosive rate8.5%
  • -6.92CPOE-0.78
  • 32.2%Third-down rate40.4%
  • 47.6%Red-zone TD rate65.4%
  • 0.97Points / drive1.89
  • 2.8%Turnover rate2.5%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

LA lead 29–20 since 1999

RAMS have won 3 straight. Meetings average 43 points. ARI are 23-25-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W18ARI @ LA2037RAMS
2025 · W14LA @ ARI4517RAMS
2024 · W17ARI @ LA913RAMS
2024 · W2LA @ ARI1041ARI
2023 · W12LA @ ARI3714RAMS
2023 · W6ARI @ LA926RAMS
2022 · W10ARI @ LA2717ARI
2022 · W3LA @ ARI2012RAMS

Box score

Individual performances

Rams

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Case Keenum18/3026620

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Todd Gurley19331.70
Case Keenum3144.70
Tavon Austin1-6-6.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Kenny Britt44820
Brian Quick26692
Lance Kendricks57520
Todd Gurley55490
Tavon Austin26140
Tyler Higbee0100

Cardinals

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Carson Palmer23/3628811
Drew Stanton4/113702

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
David Johnson17834.90
Chris Johnson6345.70
Larry Fitzgerald111.00
Andre Ellington100.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +105.8%7.2%3.2%5.0%3.4%3.3%2.6%

Positive margins favour Cardinals; negative favour Rams.

Half-point at risk

3.41%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

68.5%

Expected total

42.0est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+5.72
  • Home-field advantage+1.74
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+7.46