2016 · Week 4 · Division

Final

Rams

Los Angeles

QB Case Keenum

17·13

Cardinals

Arizona

QB Carson Palmer

University of Phoenix Stadium · closed · grass

Closing spread

ARI -10

Total

43.5

Model margin

+7.5est.

ARI perspective

Push chance

3.4%est.

the line sits on a key number

Availability

The injury report

The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.

Rams

Cardinals

Win probability

  • Cardinals
  • Rams

How each play moved the game.

Cardinals winsRams wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Ramsedge mapCardinals
  • -0.203EPA / play-0.005
  • 36.6%Success rate45.3%
  • -0.222EPA / dropback+0.043
  • -0.170EPA / rush-0.093
  • 6.8%Explosive rate8.5%
  • -6.92CPOE-0.78
  • 32.2%Third-down rate40.4%
  • 47.6%Red-zone TD rate65.4%
  • 0.97Points / drive1.89
  • 2.8%Turnover rate2.5%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

LA lead 29–21 since 1999

Meetings average 42.8 points. ARI are 24-25-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2026 · W6ARI @ LA18–16ARI
2025 · W18ARI @ LA20–37RAMS
2025 · W14LA @ ARI45–17RAMS
2024 · W17ARI @ LA9–13RAMS
2024 · W2LA @ ARI10–41ARI
2023 · W12LA @ ARI37–14RAMS
2023 · W6ARI @ LA9–26RAMS
2022 · W10ARI @ LA27–17ARI

Possession by possession

How it unfolded

Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.

Drive-by-drive log
BallStartPlaysYardsResultLA–ARI
ARIQ1 15:0031Punt0–0
LAQ1 13:2338Punt0–0
ARIQ1 11:221145Punt0–0
LAQ1 5:27885Touchdown7–0
ARIQ1 1:591164Field goal7–3
LAQ2 12:19764Field goal10–3
ARIQ2 8:42438Punt10–3
LAQ2 5:4936Punt10–3
ARIQ2 4:10312Turnover10–3
LAQ2 2:5337Punt10–3
ARIQ2 1:48880Touchdown10–10
LAQ2 0:2400End of half10–10
LAQ3 15:00431Turnover10–10
ARIQ3 13:12521Turnover10–10
LAQ3 10:321115Punt10–10
ARIQ3 5:051177Field goal10–13
LAQ4 15:00536Turnover on downs10–13
ARIQ4 12:22320Turnover10–13
LAQ4 11:11620Punt10–13
ARIQ4 8:26525Punt10–13
LAQ4 5:09519Touchdown17–13
ARIQ4 2:36620Turnover17–13
LAQ4 1:273-2Punt17–13
ARIQ4 1:01617Turnover17–13

Box score

Individual performances

Rams

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Case Keenum18/3026620

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Todd Gurley19331.70
Case Keenum3144.70
Tavon Austin1-6-6.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Kenny Britt44820
Brian Quick26692
Lance Kendricks57520
Todd Gurley55490
Tavon Austin26140
Tyler Higbee0100

Cardinals

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Carson Palmer23/3628811
Drew Stanton4/113702

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
David Johnson17834.90
Chris Johnson6345.70
Larry Fitzgerald111.00
Andre Ellington100.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +105.8%7.2%3.2%5.0%3.4%3.3%2.6%

Positive margins favour Cardinals; negative favour Rams.

Half-point at risk

3.41%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

68.5%

Expected total

42.0est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+5.72
  • Home-field advantage+1.74
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+7.46