Task Enterprises presentsNFL Intelligence

2016 · Week 4

Final

Dolphins

Miami

QB Ryan Tannehill

7·22

Bengals

Cincinnati

QB Andy Dalton

Paul Brown Stadium · outdoors · fieldturf · 62°F · wind 2mph

Closing spread

CIN -7.5

Total

46

Model margin

+3.0est.

CIN perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Bengals
  • Dolphins

How each play moved the game.

Bengals winsDolphins wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Dolphinsedge mapBengals
  • -0.004EPA / play+0.052
  • 42.2%Success rate45.3%
  • +0.062EPA / dropback+0.116
  • -0.092EPA / rush-0.050
  • 10.4%Explosive rate7.8%
  • +4.52CPOE+2.98
  • 37.0%Third-down rate38.9%
  • 68.3%Red-zone TD rate58.5%
  • 1.80Points / drive1.86
  • 2.2%Turnover rate1.4%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

All square 6–6 since 1999

CIN have won 2 straight. Meetings average 43.9 points. CIN are 5-7 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W16CIN @ MIA4521CIN
2022 · W4MIA @ CIN1527CIN
2020 · W13CIN @ MIA719MIA
2019 · W16CIN @ MIA3538MIA
2018 · W5MIA @ CIN1727CIN
2013 · W9CIN @ MIA2022MIA
2012 · W5MIA @ CIN1713MIA
2010 · W8MIA @ CIN2214MIA

Box score

Individual performances

Dolphins

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Ryan Tannehill15/2518911

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Jay Ajayi6335.50
Kenyan Drake2157.50
Damien Williams294.50
Isaiah Pead351.70

Bengals

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Andy Dalton22/3129610

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Jeremy Hill21713.40
Giovani Bernard10181.80
Andy Dalton6-12-2.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
A.J. Green10121731
C.J. Uzomah45450
Brandon LaFell46440
Giovani Bernard34240
Tyler Boyd13100
Jeremy Hill0100

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +7.53.9%6.9%7.5%3.1%4.8%3.1%2.7%

Positive margins favour Bengals; negative favour Dolphins.

Half-point at risk

2.11%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

57.2%

Expected total

44.1est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+1.29
  • Home-field advantage+1.74
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+3.03