2016 · Week 10

Final

Vikings

Minnesota

QB Sam Bradford

20·26

Commanders

Washington

QB Kirk Cousins

FedExField · outdoors · grass · 58°F · wind 7mph

Closing spread

WAS -2.5

Total

42

Model margin

+2.8est.

WAS perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Commanders
  • Vikings

How each play moved the game.

Commanders winsVikings wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Vikingsedge mapCommanders
  • -0.042EPA / play+0.118
  • 42.5%Success rate48.2%
  • +0.075EPA / dropback+0.202
  • -0.253EPA / rush-0.033
  • 7.1%Explosive rate10.6%
  • +3.80CPOE+4.99
  • 38.4%Third-down rate44.9%
  • 49.1%Red-zone TD rate51.2%
  • 1.65Points / drive2.32
  • 1.3%Turnover rate1.9%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

MIN lead 9–4 since 1999

MIN have won 4 straight. Meetings average 46.6 points. WAS are 5-7-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W14WAS @ MIN031MIN
2022 · W9MIN @ WAS2017MIN
2019 · W8WAS @ MIN919MIN
2017 · W10MIN @ WAS3830MIN
2014 · W9WAS @ MIN2629MIN
2013 · W10WAS @ MIN2734MIN
2012 · W6MIN @ WAS2638WAS
2011 · W16MIN @ WAS3326MIN

Box score

Individual performances

Vikings

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Sam Bradford31/4030721

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Jerick McKinnon6162.70
Matt Asiata9131.41
Adam Thielen11111.00
Ronnie Hillman420.50

Commanders

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Kirk Cousins22/3326220

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Rob Kelley22974.40
Chris Thompson4256.30
Jamison Crowder177.00
Kirk Cousins1-1-1.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Pierre Garcon610810
Vernon Davis33661
Jordan Reed24410
Jamison Crowder46371
Maurice Harris33280
Chris Thompson33110
Ryan Grant0300
Rob Kelley11-20

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +2.53.9%2.6%6.9%7.5%3.1%4.8%3.0%2.7%

Positive margins favour Commanders; negative favour Vikings.

Half-point at risk

7.52%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

56.5%

Expected total

45.1est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+0.45
  • Home-field advantage+1.74
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential+0.56
  • Expected margin+2.75