2025 · Week 14

Final

Commanders

Washington

QB Marcus Mariota

0·31

Vikings

Minnesota

QB J.J. McCarthy

U.S. Bank Stadium · dome · sportturf

Closing spread

WAS -1.5

Total

43.5

Model margin

+4.1est.

MIN perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Vikings
  • Commanders

How each play moved the game.

Vikings winsCommanders wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Commandersedge mapVikings
  • +0.035EPA / play-0.094
  • 46.4%Success rate43.3%
  • +0.084EPA / dropback-0.115
  • -0.039EPA / rush-0.062
  • 8.6%Explosive rate8.4%
  • +0.67CPOE-2.84
  • 37.2%Third-down rate32.4%
  • 72.8%Red-zone TD rate55.7%
  • 2.03Points / drive1.75
  • 2.0%Turnover rate2.7%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

MIN lead 9–4 since 1999

MIN have won 4 straight. Meetings average 46.6 points. MIN are 7-5-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2022 · W9MIN @ WAS2017MIN
2019 · W8WAS @ MIN919MIN
2017 · W10MIN @ WAS3830MIN
2016 · W10MIN @ WAS2026WAS
2014 · W9WAS @ MIN2629MIN
2013 · W10WAS @ MIN2734MIN
2012 · W6MIN @ WAS2638WAS
2011 · W16MIN @ WAS3326MIN

Box score

Individual performances

Commanders

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Jayden Daniels9/207801
Marcus Mariota2/43001

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Chris Rodriguez Jr.10525.20
Jacory Croskey-Merritt7324.60
Jayden Daniels4164.00
Marcus Mariota273.50

Vikings

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
J.J. McCarthy16/2316330

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Aaron Jones14765.40
Jordan Mason11524.71
J.J. McCarthy6193.20
Zavier Scott3155.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line -1.53.7%6.6%7.5%3.2%4.9%3.2%2.9%

Positive margins favour Vikings; negative favour Commanders.

Half-point at risk

2.03%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

60.1%

Expected total

44.6est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+2.41
  • Home-field advantage+1.71
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+4.11